16F628 to 16F627 code

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nothing. The only difference is less memory so if it fits it works.

Mike.
 
If you are using MPLAB with a programmer then you need to change the device. If you are just using the hex file then it will work either way.

Mike.
 
Transistorman said:
hi

is it important to change the code , from this
Code: 
list p=16f628
	#include<p16f628.inc>
to this
Code: 
list p=16f627
	#include<p16f627.inc>
??
Click to expand...

No, there's no real need to, but I would suggest it's a good idea to, so you get used to always using the correct include file.
 
Transistorman said:
why did they 627 if 628 is already a better one ?
Click to expand...

As a cheaper alternative, for smaller applications - it's the exact same device, just with half the program memory.

Personally I've never bought a 627, as I don't see any point in doing so?.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

N
  • Question
Help Debugging PIC16F84A Code for Dual Tank System
Replies
2
Views
3K
Ian Rogers
E
  • Question
High res cap meter with PIC 16F628
Replies
7
Views
6K
Elekktrishun
E
  • Question
ns to us delay
Replies
14
Views
3K
be80be
  • Question
Light sensor to Arduino.
Replies
1
Views
3K
Lightium
P
Is MCC (code Configurator) wrong?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Ian Rogers
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…