Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
Is the pin configuration for the pin SCLK is used for correct. With multi-function pins on many processors this can be a convoluted process to decode and implement.
If that is the case, it might explain why MG32F157VCT6 is not generating SCLK. SPI is not a request response kind of exchange. Whenever data is sent, data is also received on the same clock pulses. The received data is whatever the peripheral device has available when a transmission begins...
The problem is overhead. There is no hardware mechanism for detecting this condition. For every stack access, you need to check that the SP (Stack Pointer) register is within limits before and after the operation. This will also detect underflow which is equally undesirable. I've spent half a...
Without a schematic I can't tell you precisely what I am talking about. Any analog receiver chip will have specifications related to thresholds for various signal states. When signal levels are degraded for whatever reason the reliable detection of signals also decreases. At some point reliable...
You should try to correlate your received levels with the receiver threshold. Changing the antenna may have lifted the received levels enough above the threshold to make the reception more reliable.
There may be similarities in the layouts, but each hardware architecture will have unique features. For example, some devices begin execution at a low address while others use a high address. There are even examples of beginning addresses the are in between low and high. The operation of stack...
What would you be willing to pay for certified and verified models? I'll wager large sums it would not be enough to compensate those who do the work. That's probably the main reason there is no such thing.
It is true that I have expended considerable effort on simulation after years of building things only to toss them in a corner. It is way more cost effective this way. You probably don't want to know what we call people that give up too easily.
The other strategy is to ramp up the input voltage using the PULSE specification with a "long" Ton and a single cycle.
OR
use a PWL (piecewise linear specification, that way you don't introduce a virtual step function with a VERY large dV/dt. e.g. .param OneYear = 60*60*24*365
OR
You could...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
