![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Robotics Chat Specific to discussions about robots and the making of. |
![]() |
| | Tools |
| | #1 |
|
Hi all! Im building robot for outdoor competition (like US DARPA grand challenge but smaller) and i want to use IR to object detection. I dont need information about how far object is, i only need detect object is/isnt before robot. I would like to detect object in cca. 2 meters. Can you give me some tips to artiles or some materials about this? I want use IR, not RADAR or camera or something else. thx | |
| |
| | #2 |
|
2m is only possible with focused IR- which means optics- which means hard to DIY. Look for one of the sharp IR sensors. Perhaps you can find a proximity version and stick it on a rotating mast or something or if not, just use one of the rangefinder versions, and then you can just ignore all readings greater than 2m. The beamwidth is not as wide as you want, nor as narrow as you might think. At a distance of 2m you might only need 3 or 4 sensors in an array to get a 180 degree spread (although as objects get closer, gaps form between the beams and the object is more likely to "dissapear"). Last edited by dknguyen; 31st July 2006 at 06:11 AM. | |
| |
| | #3 |
|
with a normal IR and 38 k modulation , I have managed only 4 feet without any false triggering IR reflective power loss is very high . I doubt if you can get more distance. Ultrasonic echo would be the only choice.
__________________ K.S.Sankar | |
| |
| | #4 |
|
use Sonar for accurate distance measurement sometimes 38KhzIR+TSOP will be helpful for good distance in meters IRLED+phtodiode gives upto 5cm. So choose any of these http://booksbybibin.14.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=115 Bibin John www.booksbybibin.tk | |
| |
| | #5 |
|
I know some manufactures who produce these IR sensor .It is used for detecting thief who break your home .The distance is 2,3m . If you want ,why don't you buy them to discover the schematic i think it is good . For me ,I use a TSOP to receiver IR from TV remote ,and the MCU to decode the signal from it.the software is very complicated because of the interference from the other IR source
__________________ E-DESIGN prestigious and quality http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/giaosu...765scd&.src=ph contact me:giaosucan2000@yahoo.com | |
| |
| | #6 |
|
So, I take a decision to use ultrasound detector instead of IR. I think it will be the best thing for me
| |
| |
| | #7 |
|
parrallax has a product that is good for 5 meters and is a motion detector; this coupled with stereo sonar and stereo IR should help your robot pinpoint a moving target. Then your robot would have three sensor ranges, close, medium and long. The Sonar would provide detection up to 6 - 12 ft with a 1 ft accuracy, and Oft difference below 6ft. Also, it is important to remember that IR in an outdoor enviroment is not allways accurate, as dust and debree will cause miss readings, so having two IRs will help determine if the target is near and within range of attacking.
| |
| |
| | #8 | |
| Quote:
| ||
| |
| | #9 | |
| Quote:
using a micro controller, you have to establish 2 readings, store them, and compare them, 1- send IR, and read the sensor output, store it 2- Stop sending IR,and read the sensor output, store it if you get (1) from the sensor in both cases, then the IR is not working good, dure to surrounding light, noize, etc... if you get (1) then (0), there is an abstacle detected. if you get (0) in both cases, there is nothing infront of you, for SURE! think about it.. | ||
| |
| | #10 | |
| Quote:
Last edited by dknguyen; 7th September 2006 at 01:50 PM. | ||
| |
| | #11 | |
| Quote:
Well honnestly i tested it, and it worked perfectly, using a microcontroller at only 12Mhz, you can switch it on and off very fast, faster than any moving object around. but about knowing if something had moved out of range or under range, i guess you are right.. it may lack this point. | ||
| |
| | #12 |
|
Ah, yeah I guess it can switch on and off pretty fast.
| |
| |
| | #13 |
|
use a 38khz IR module. it will give you UP TO 3m with out any false result. http://robotroom.com/Infrared555.html http://robotroom.com/InfraredTransmitter.html | |
| |
| | #14 | |
| Quote:
Microcontrollers run many, many times faster than the robot itself, processor speed isn't an issue at all - the programme will spend almost all it's time in loops waiting for the hardware!. | ||
| |
| | #15 |
|
I take a decision to use ultrasound detector instead of IR . I think it will be the best thing for me
| |
| |
|
| Tags |
| detection, object, outdoor |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |