Electronic Projects, forums and more.

Go Back   Electronic Circuits Projects Diagrams Free > Electronics Categories > Micro Controllers


Micro Controllers Discuss all aspects of micro controllers - building them, coding them, etc. All controllers are welcome - PIC, BASIC, Z8 Encore!, etc.

Reply
 
Tools
Old 1st February 2004, 03:12 PM   #1
Default 16F876 vs 16F877

When would one use the 876 instead of the 877?

It seems that the 877 offers a lot more io and memory for a few cents more.
heida11 is offline  
Old 1st February 2004, 04:05 PM   #2
Default

For a smaller board.. I guest
falleafd is offline  
Old 1st February 2004, 05:37 PM   #3
Default

Other companies would... For mass production they try to save every penny they can.

The few cents you say turn into big numbers when you're mass producing something.
Exo is offline  
Old 1st February 2004, 05:53 PM   #4
Default Re: 16F876 vs 16F877

Quote:
Originally Posted by heida11
When would one use the 876 instead of the 877?

It seems that the 877 offers a lot more io and memory for a few cents more.
I think you have the question the wrong way round :lol:

It should be 'when would one use an 877 instead of an 876', the answer is when you need more I/O than an 876 provides.

You don't get more memory, just more I/O, they are pretty well identical chips - but one has less legs :lol:

The biggest advantage of the 876 is the 'skinny DIP' case, it makes it a lot smaller - the 877 is just huge! - if the 876 was full width, it wouldn't be half as useful.

If you use an 877 where an 876 would do, you are obviously wasting some facilities on the chip - money wise, there's not any difference worth bothering about. I use both, if an 876 will do, I'll use that - if it won't, I move to an 877 - if I was starting a project, where I suspected I might need as much I/O as possible, I'd probably start with the 877 to begin with.
Nigel Goodwin is online now  
Old 1st February 2004, 06:12 PM   #5
Default Re: 16F876 vs 16F877

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel Goodwin
The biggest advantage of the 876 is the 'skinny DIP' case, it makes it a lot smaller - the 877 is just huge! - if the 876 was full width, it wouldn't be half as useful.
The 877 is available in PLCC package. Wich is quite small, There are sockets for these smd packages, that convert the pins to normal spacing so you can use them on normal boards

ever seen a 877 in TQFP package. smaller then a F84
Exo is offline  
Old 1st February 2004, 06:25 PM   #6
Default Re: 16F876 vs 16F877

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exo
ever seen a 877 in TQFP package. smaller then a F84
I've not seen one, but I usually ignore other than DIL chips, as I don't do PCB's - but I've seen plenty of tiny SM chips, a 40 pin one can be really small.
Nigel Goodwin is online now  
Old 4th February 2004, 09:04 AM   #7
Default

Previously, i use 877 in my project. However, while i plotting the PCB layout, i realise 877 is waste of space. (of course, i am using the DIP). As there are many unused pins in my 877, i replace it with 876 and just made some slight change in my program.

Why microchip produce such wide range variety of microcontroller??
cost is a factor. 877 is more expensive, and making the cost of PCB higher.
so, if you dont need so much pins, why would u wan to use 877.
StupidDum is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32 AM.


Electronic Circuits  |  Learning Electronics
eXTReMe Tracker