![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Micro Controllers Discuss all aspects of micro controllers - building them, coding them, etc. All controllers are welcome - PIC, BASIC, Z8 Encore!, etc. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
(permalink) |
|
I'm building this programer http://www.best-microcontroller-proj...r-circuit.html.
Does someone tried to program a 12f683 with a AN589 based programer? Any tips about the software used whould be apreciated.
__________________
If is too complicated.....most of the times is the wrong way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
The 12F683 isn't in the supported list for that programmer.
http://www.ic-prog.com/index1.htm Odd thing is it appears to be a HVP type programmer but they want you to pull LVP to GND (makes it seem like a low voltage programmer) It does seem to support the more common 12F629 and 12F675. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Well the AN589 was originally ONLY for the 16C84, and it was never very popular, as it was quite a strange design.
But it uses the same programming connections as any serially programmed PIC, and should work with most PIC's supported by IC-Prog. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
T Y for your answers. The idea that seems to program the 12f629/675 made me wonder. Because i only buy 12f683 (is cheaper than 629/675 and easyer to find.
The one I want to build it's a gift for someone who just bought a 16f84. I was just curious (shoot me) if someone used it for a 683. Hope that my friend will pass the '84 phase and still use the programer.
__________________
If is too complicated.....most of the times is the wrong way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Why build a more complicated programmer that's not well supported?, just build a David Tait type one, like the P16PRO and P16PRO40.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
__________________
If is too complicated.....most of the times is the wrong way. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
It's considered 'strange' because it's over complicated, simply because it's designed using a bad choice of chips - with a little extra thought about was was required David Tait produced a simpler more useful design, and the AN589 was doomed!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
err.. Actually, I'm building a 'tait-type' right now and finding it bit more complicated. It uses more gates and more pull up/down resistors than the an589. Also, can the buffers really be switched between inverting and non-inverting without requiring any circuit changes?
I'm building this programmer because an589 did not permit control over the Vdd line and thus was not able to do 'vpp-before-vdd'. I'm not really sure if Tait's support that, but as the Vdd can be switched at will, I'm assuming it can |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|