Electronic Projects, forums and more.

Go Back   Electronic Circuits Projects Diagrams Free > Electronics Categories > Micro Controllers


Micro Controllers Discuss all aspects of micro controllers - building them, coding them, etc. All controllers are welcome - PIC, BASIC, Z8 Encore!, etc.

Reply
 
Tools
Old 10th December 2004, 11:25 PM   #16
Default

it means that each output pin has a transistor with the collector being connected to the pin..
open collector outputs can sink a lot more current than standard TTL outputs..
williB is offline  
Old 10th December 2004, 11:28 PM   #17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by williB
it means that each output pin has a transistor with the collector being connected to the pin..
open collector outputs can sink a lot more current than standard TTL outputs..
But that's not their main reason!. It's so it can be pulled higher than TTL voltages by a pullup resistor, or multiple outputs can be ORed together with a simple pullup resistor. It's a very versatile output, for some purposes far better than normal TTL outputs, but for others not as good, mostly it's used to interface between TTL and something else.
__________________
PIC programmer software, and PIC Tutorials at:
http://www.winpicprog.co.uk
Nigel Goodwin is online now  
Old 15th August 2009, 01:53 AM   #18
Default

Alsalm alaycom
First of all I want to thank you for your efforts
I want to ask about pic 16f877a programmer is it the same of 16f877 and I wounder if you could help me to get its schematic.
and whate about programmers types like JDM programmers or PIC burner whate the difference between them and which one is recommended
Mohammed Gamal is offline  
Old 15th August 2009, 09:18 AM   #19
Default

The difference is the software,the hardware for the 877 and 877a is identical.

Never heard of PIC Burner, but JDM's are the most unreliable programmer there is.

I would strongly suggest you get a PICKit2 or a clone.
__________________
PIC programmer software, and PIC Tutorials at:
http://www.winpicprog.co.uk
Nigel Goodwin is online now  
Old 15th August 2009, 11:23 AM   #20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel Goodwin View Post
The difference is the software,the hardware for the 877 and 877a is identical.

Never heard of PIC Burner, but JDM's are the most unreliable programmer there is.

I would strongly suggest you get a PICKit2 or a clone.
Pic burner is another LPT port programmer with external power supply. One design with this tile was published in Electronics For You magazine In India.
__________________
Regards,
Sarma.
mvs sarma is offline  
Old 16th August 2009, 11:49 PM   #21
Default

alsalam alaycom

Quote:
The difference is the software,the hardware for the 877 and 877a is identical.
what is the recommended software for each type ?

Quote:
JDM's are the most unreliable programmer
why JDM programmers are unreliable ?
I was going to make one

Quote:
I would strongly suggest you get a PICKit2 or a clone.
Why you prefer them ?
How could I get there schematics
they are not in winpic800 hardware list . what is the software suggested ? .

Thank you and sorry for asking tooooooo .
Mohammed Gamal is offline  
Old 17th August 2009, 09:13 AM   #22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohammed Gamal View Post
alsalam alaycom


what is the recommended software for each type ?
Most software will do both, it would be rare to find one that didn't.

Quote:

why JDM programmers are unreliable ?
I was going to make one
Because they rely on the PC seriel port exceeding the RS232 specification.

Quote:

Why you prefer them ?
Because they are MicroChip supported, they get new devices added automatically, and work direct from MPLAB.

Quote:

How could I get there schematics
they are not in winpic800 hardware list . what is the software suggested ? .
As I said above, they work direct from MPLAB, or the PICKit2 software.
__________________
PIC programmer software, and PIC Tutorials at:
http://www.winpicprog.co.uk
Nigel Goodwin is online now  
Old 17th August 2009, 07:11 PM   #23
Default

I'll chime in here...

The JDM and all those other old programmer designs are pretty much defunct now.
They mostly have interface problems, timing issues and really don't like modern PC hardware, they had their place and time, but no longer. If I desperately had to build a programmer to burn a one off device out in the sticks somewhere, I may well put together something like a JDM or PicPro etc with a couple of transistors and resistors etc. It won't be particularly reliable, but may get the job done at the time.

The value in a decent programmer cannot be understated. Whether you choose a Microchip PICKit2, a clone of some sort, or a professional programmer like the Xeltek that I have matters not. What matters is that the programmer is consistent and reliable, allowing you to concentrate on what you want to do with it, rather than wondering if a device didn't program because the serial port doesn't quite cut it, or the programming voltage fluctuates just enough etc. A decent programmer also has regular support from both the manufacturer and the community and may even have added features like a small logic analyser as in the case of the PICKit2 et al, or a logic chip tester like my Xeltek has.

If the genuine Microchip PICKit2 is too expensive for you, look into the Junebug from Bill at Blueroom, or a straight PICKit2 clone from Sure Electronics. If I were to choose between those, I would have the Junebug on account of it's added features, however both are reliable and consistent programmers, have good ongoing support and features and will allow you to get into your project immediately.


rgds
tunedwolf is offline  
Reply

Tags
programmer

Thread Tools
Display Modes




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Electronic Circuits  |  Learning Electronics
eXTReMe Tracker