+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 Last
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: how do I do this equation

  1. #1
    north Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    25

    Default how do I do this equation

    forgive me for I'm sure this is an easy mathematical question but I'm just starting out in a course called ELECTRO-Mechanical Technician. I just did an exam, my first in this course, but a question has been bugging me.

    the question was 4.91x10^12 electrons are taken out of the flow and then to transfer this into nano. the answer is 787nC.( if I recall accurately).( it is right by the way,787nC, I have the results, but not the specific question, I'm just going by memory)

    this what I thought I should do. since 1 C is 6.24x10^18 electrons. I should subtract 4.91x10^12 from 1C , but in order to do so I have to make the exponents the same> so 4.91x10^12 becomes 4,910,000x10^18 - 6.24x10^18 which does not give the above answer.

    WHAT I"M I DOING WRONG!!
    Last edited by north; 13th January 2007 at 12:32 AM.


  2. #2
    north Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    25

    Default

    okay I tried dividing, my only other option, 4.91x10^12 by 6.24x10^18 and I get 7.868589744^29 which is on the right track, but why would I assume that the answer is already in nano's.

    I don't get it. since nano's is 10^9 why wouldn't I say the answer is 7.87x10^20?

    there's something I'm not quite getting here.

    (by the way people I've done the exam already, just in case some may think I'm cheating. cheating in the end only cheats one self)
    Last edited by north; 13th January 2007 at 12:55 AM.

  3. #3
    dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    6,029

    Default

    Please rephrase this more clearly:
    the question was 4.91x10^12 electrons are taken out of the flow and then to transfer this into nano. the answer is 787nC.( if I recall accurately).( it is right by the way,787nC, I have the results, but not the specific question, I'm just going by memory)
    What is nano?

    BTW:
    (4.91x10^12) / (6.24x10^18) = 786.8589744^-9 (exponents are added when you multiply, subtracted when you divide)

    Try and use some math notation, especially with whacky numbers. It makes it shorter and they don't get lost in the paragraph.

    EDIT: I think I understand your question now. It's basically, how many Coloumbs, do X electrons make right? Well, you said that there are Y electrons/C, and you have X electrons. Therefore you must go
    X/Y = Z[Coloumbs].

    That's the way the units cancel out which verifies it is correct. You are just grouping the electrons into Coloumbs.

    It's like saying, if I have 36, and 12 is a dozen, how many dozens do I have? 36/12 = 3.
    Last edited by dknguyen; 13th January 2007 at 02:14 AM.

  4. #4
    north Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dknguyen
    Please rephrase this more clearly:


    What is nano?
    nano is 10^-9

    Quote Originally Posted by dknguyen
    BTW:
    (4.91x10^12) / (6.24x10^18) = 786.8589744^-9 (exponents are added when you multiply, subtracted when you divide)

    Try and use some math notation, especially with whacky numbers. It makes it shorter and they don't get lost in the paragraph.

    EDIT: I think I understand your question now. It's basically, how many Coloumbs, do X electrons make right? Well, you said that there are Y electrons/C, and you have X electrons. Therefore you must go
    X/Y = Z[Coloumbs].

    That's the way the units cancel out which verifies it is correct. You are just grouping the electrons into Coloumbs.

    It's like saying, if I have 36, and 12 is a dozen, how many dozens do I have? 36/12 = 3.

    when I went to ENG on my calculator I got 786.8589744^27.

    have I set my calculator wrong, some how?

    I'm concerned with my ability to interpret what the calculator is actually telling me.
    Last edited by north; 13th January 2007 at 03:38 AM.

  5. #5
    dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    6,029

    Default

    Well, you should always visually check your numbers to make sure they make sense. I don't use eng mode on my calculator. I have to stay in imaginary numbers for other purposes and I hate how eng mode rounds for me. Does it do it in regular mode?

    Does 10^12/10^10 = 100 on your calulator?
    Does 10^12/10^-10 = 10^22 on your calulator?
    Does 10^-12/10^10 = 10^-22 on your calulator?
    Does 10^-12/10^-10 = 10^-2 on your calulator?

    If so, I'd get a new one...probably a different model. I have no idea what would cause that. What are you using? A TI? Are you sure you aren't just punching it in wrong again and again. I know I've done that before. 6 entries with 6 different numbers every time for me. Had to go to ~13, before I had one answer repeat 3 times.

    When I meant what is nano, I was expecting for you to respond nano-COULOUMBS. That's why I didnt understand your question.
    Last edited by dknguyen; 13th January 2007 at 03:43 AM.

  6. #6
    north Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dknguyen
    Maybe the negative exponent sign on your calacultor is burnt out? You should always double check your answers from visual inspection though. I don't use eng mode on my calculator. I have to stay in imaginary numbers for other purposes and I hate how eng mode rounds for me.

    Does 10^12/10^10 = 100 on your calulator?
    Does 10^12/10^-10 = 10^22 on your calulator?

    When I meant what is nano, I was expecting for you to respond nano-COULOUMBS. That's why I didnt understand your question.
    when I did 10^12/10^10 = 100, that is what I got, 100

    nano-COULOUMBS is what I meant

    thanks for your response by the way. it is appreciated

    north

  7. #7
    dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    6,029

    Default

    Huh, weirdness. Oh, I changed my response since I realized that -27 is still not equal to -9, regardless of whether or not the negative sign was burnt out.

  8. #8
    north Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dknguyen
    Huh, weirdness. Oh, I changed my response since I realized that -27 is still not equal to -9, regardless of whether or not the negative sign was burnt out.

    let me ask you, how would you do my above problem? never mind my problems with my calculator. just tell me how you would do it your self. and why your answer would be necessarily in nC. to you.

    north

  9. #9
    hjames Okay
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bezerkeley, USA
    Posts
    677

    Default

    4.91E12 / 6.42E18 = (4.91/6.42)E(12-18) = .767E-6 = 767E-9 = 767nC

  10. #10
    dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    6,029

    Default

    My answer wouldn't necessarily be in nC. It would be in Couloumbs on some order of magnitude.

    I would think, oh, well I know electrons carry a charge and Coloumb is a unit of charge. I would then think how many many electrons are required to make a charge equal to a Coulomb? Then I'd look in my formula sheet and go oh here it is

    6.24x10^18 electrons / Couloumb

    Then if that's the number, all I have to do is group the electrons up into Couloumbs and count how many groups there are (divide).

    Then I would go:

    4.91x10^12 electrons / (6.24x10^18 electrons / Couloumb)

    = 787 x 10^-9 * (electrons/electrons) * [1 / (1/Couloumbs)]
    = 787 x 10^-9 * 1 * Couloumbs
    = 787 x 10^-9 Couloumbs
    = 787 nC

    You know what I am doing when I divide the units right? You can treat units just like numbers. They divide and all that, even the magnitude prefixes like milli, kilo, or nano can cancel each other out across different units:

    mm/ms = m/s

    It works on any prefix actually as long as you take into account the difference in zeroes.
    km/ms = Mm/s (M = mega)

    It's just a shortcut instead of converting it to the base unit and sticking a "x10^#) at the end. The units must cancel out properly and give you right units at the end or you did something wrong...ALWAYS in every question. It's not hard...you're just getting flustered because it's a test question. Either that, or you don't understand how electrons carry a charge, Couloumbs is a unit of charge, therefore a certain amount of electrons can make a certain Couloumbs of charge.
    Last edited by dknguyen; 14th January 2007 at 04:46 AM.

  11. #11
    Pommie Excellent Pommie Excellent Pommie Excellent Pommie Excellent Pommie Excellent Pommie Excellent Pommie Excellent Pommie Excellent Pommie Excellent Pommie Excellent Pommie Excellent
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Brisbane Australia
    Posts
    6,806

    Default

    (4.91x10^12) / (6.24x10^18) = 786*10^-9

    4.91x10^12 / 6.24x10^18 = 786*10^27

    North, your not entering the numbers correctly.

    Mike.

  12. #12
    north Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    25

    Default

    everybody thanks for the responses it is appreciated. really!! time though to snooze. I will think and try all points of view. for I must "get it".

    north

  13. #13
    RODALCO Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Akld, New Zealand
    Posts
    937

    Default

    Sometimes it is easier to write those values out on paper with all leading or trailing zero's, and space them out in groups of three.
    Then by crossing of zero's get manageable numbers and then do the final part the long way of via calculator.
    There are more ways to get to Rome.

    Electricity, Electric clocks, Meters and Trains are great.

    Please don't sent me private messages, I will not answer them.
    The questions asked can be discussed in the open forums.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/RODALCO2007 some interesting electrical stuff to watch.

  14. #14
    Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Idaho, USA
    Posts
    6,723

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dknguyen
    My answer wouldn't necessarily be in nC. It would be in Couloumbs on some order of magnitude.

    I would think, oh, well I know electrons carry a charge and Coloumb is a unit of charge. I would then think how many many electrons are required to make a charge equal to a Coulomb? Then I'd look in my formula sheet and go oh here it is

    6.24x10^18 electrons / Couloumb

    Then if that's the number, all I have to do is group the electrons up into Couloumbs and count how many groups there are (divide).

    Then I would go:

    4.91x10^12 electrons / (6.24x10^18 electrons / Couloumb)

    = 7.87 x 10^-9 * (electrons/electrons) * [1 / (1/Couloumbs)]
    = 7.87 x 10^-9 * 1 * Couloumbs
    = 7.87 x 10^-9 Couloumbs
    = 7.87 nC

    You know what I am doing when I divide the units right? You can treat units just like numbers. They divide and all that, even the magnitude prefixes like milli, kilo, or nano can cancel each other out across different units:

    mm/ms = m/s

    It works on any prefix actually as long as you take into account the difference in zeroes.
    km/ms = Mm/s (M = mega)

    It's just a shortcut instead of converting it to the base unit and sticking a "x10^#) at the end. The units must cancel out properly and give you right units at the end or you did something wrong...ALWAYS in every question. It's not hard...you're just getting flustered because it's a test question. Either that, or you don't understand how electrons carry a charge, Couloumbs is a unit of charge, therefore a certain amount of electrons can make a certain Couloumbs of charge.
    What? I get 787nC.
    Ron


  15. #15
    Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent Roff Excellent
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Idaho, USA
    Posts
    6,723

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hjames
    4.91E12 / 6.42E18 = (4.91/6.42)E(12-18) = .767E-6 = 767E-9 = 767nC
    6.42e18 should read 6.24e18, giving an answer of 787nC.
    Ron


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 Last

Similar Threads

  1. equation
    By chandu13 in forum Micro Controllers
    Replies: 7
    Latest: 19th December 2006, 10:08 AM
  2. Diode equation
    By Electronics4you in forum General Electronics Chat
    Replies: 5
    Latest: 1st December 2006, 08:53 PM
  3. mAh equation
    By GST_Nem in forum General Electronics Chat
    Replies: 23
    Latest: 10th April 2006, 09:42 PM
  4. power mosfet transfer equation
    By bryant83 in forum Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews
    Replies: 3
    Latest: 20th March 2004, 02:40 PM
  5. integral equation
    By pinky in forum Micro Controllers
    Replies: 3
    Latest: 6th January 2004, 03:15 PM

Tags for this Thread