Electronic Projects, forums and more.

Go Back   Electronic Circuits Projects Diagrams Free > Electronics Forums > General Electronics Chat


General Electronics Chat This forum is for general chat about electronics, eg: Dont know what a part does? Dont know how to read a circuit? Want to get an opinion?

Reply
 
Tools
Old 7th August 2009, 06:55 PM   #196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PulsarProFX View Post
Hi Mark,

The problem is you didn't calibrate the HEAT of the iron. The objective is to never be able to reach the melting temperature of your particular toner. The more pressure (eg. entire body weight as a 'constant') the less temperature needed to achieve the "sticky" state of toner. These two properties (sticky and melting temperatures) are VERY close with just the weight of the iron and maybe a few pounds of downward force, however, crank up the pressure and you can crank down the heat, thus increasing the "spread" between fusing and melting temps. This is why calibrating the iron is so important otherwise you'll have too much temp for the pressure and total toner distortion happens. With a calibrated iron, you can leave the iron on indefinitely with max pressure and nothing will happen to the toner, It'll never get to melting temp so it can't distort... ever! It took us a long time to get all of this figured out.

Frank from Pulsar
as i told above ,, on my first try the print made on copper board was good but light , so i again placed the printed wax paper and set the iron (1000W) to max heat for 10mins.

The Result : print on the copper board was just a little better than before but a small portion in the middle just swelled up(and detached form the board) & WASTED ..

Conclusion: at max temperature, using 1000w iron , only 3-4min will do the job
__________________
Rεσllγ !!! Mγ Σ×ρer!ence is Directly Propotional τΘ the NΦ of Electronic Items I have Me§§eD µρ ...

Last edited by tariq7868; 7th August 2009 at 07:04 PM.
tariq7868 is offline  
Old 8th August 2009, 03:41 AM   #197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tariq7868 View Post
as i told above ,, on my first try the print made on copper board was good but light , so i again placed the printed wax paper and set the iron (1000W) to max heat for 10mins.

The Result : print on the copper board was just a little better than before but a small portion in the middle just swelled up(and detached form the board) & WASTED ..

Conclusion: at max temperature, using 1000w iron , only 3-4min will do the job
The iron I use heat up in about a minute, max temperature is likely to be to hot and the toner will bubble. It is best to check you iron temp. with a suitable thermometer. Set it to 300°F.
If you dont have a thermometer set the iron between acrylic and polyester to start with.
Remembering back to my experiments; the wax paper had a good side (and a bad), I think it was the duller of the two sides that worked best.
Rolf is offline  
Old 8th August 2009, 02:15 PM   #198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolf View Post
Set it to 300°F.
If you dont have a thermometer set the iron between acrylic and polyester to start with.
Actually there's no hard and fast rule: it depends on the toner's melting point.
__________________

I do not answer private messages asking for help because no one else can: benefit from advice I may give or correct me if I'm wrong.

Please ask on the open forum if you have a question and I'll be happy to help,
if I know the answer.
Hero999 is offline  
Old 8th August 2009, 02:53 PM   #199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hero999 View Post
Actually there's no hard and fast rule: it depends on the toner's melting point.
The different printers toners fusion temp. must be in the same ballpark, otherwise why would the P-n-P instructions state 300°F +/- 25°F.
Where are you getting your information from?
Rolf is offline  
Old 8th August 2009, 03:07 PM   #200
Default

I run the iron all the way up and iron for 3+ minutes and it always works well. Will check temp next time and see what the iron runs.
mramos1 is offline  
Old 8th August 2009, 03:20 PM   #201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mramos1 View Post
I run the iron all the way up and iron for 3+ minutes and it always works well. Will check temp next time and see what the iron runs.
Great! If there are large inconsistencies in temperature requirements we need to know.
So I will start: I use a HP printer and it works great at <3min at 300°F.
We are of cause talking about toner transfer using an iron.
Rolf is offline  
Old 8th August 2009, 03:24 PM   #202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolf View Post
Great! If there are large inconsistencies in temperature requirements we need to know.
So I will start: I use a HP printer and it works great at <3min at 300°F.
We are of cause talking about toner transfer using an iron.
Been doing it that way probably 6 or 7 years. I did try PnP way back, but yielded about the same results. So why spend the money was my thought.

Tried the laminating machine as well, took too many passes when the iron does it in minutes.
mramos1 is offline  
Old 8th August 2009, 04:41 PM   #203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolf View Post
The different printers toners fusion temp. must be in the same ballpark, otherwise why would the P-n-P instructions state 300°F +/- 25°F.
Where are you getting your information from?
The Pulsar website and my experience with different printers, the temperature seems to vary quite a bit.

__________________

I do not answer private messages asking for help because no one else can: benefit from advice I may give or correct me if I'm wrong.

Please ask on the open forum if you have a question and I'll be happy to help,
if I know the answer.
Hero999 is offline  
Old 8th August 2009, 05:15 PM   #204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hero999 View Post
The Pulsar website and my experience with different printers, the temperature seems to vary quite a bit.

What do you mean by "quite a bit"? Is 300°F =/- 25°F "quite a bit" or just a little bit?
I can't stomach all the ambiguity in information on the Pulsar site, and I only saw one reference to temperature, 275°F. They are in essence jut pushing their laminator sales and we are talking about using an iron.
If it is large difference why don't they publish the fact? In other words the temp. required for each brand of printers.
Time and temperature are major components of this process and we need reliable information to get good repeatable results.
Rolf is offline  
Old 8th August 2009, 06:04 PM   #205
Default

Rolf have you seen this page ?
PCB "Fab-In-A-Box" ... The 8min circuit board system

Look for

CALIBRATING THE IRON:


This is more useful then a table of toner temperature setting.


3v0
__________________
Please post questions to the forums. PM's are for personal communication.

BCHS/3v0's Tutorials
Junebug USB PIC programmer kit., USB Bit Whacker,
The 15 Minute Printed Circuit Board! (+drill time)
3v0 is offline  
Old 8th August 2009, 06:30 PM   #206
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3v0 View Post
Rolf have you seen this page ?
PCB "Fab-In-A-Box" ... The 8min circuit board system

Look for

CALIBRATING THE IRON:


This is more useful then a table of toner temperature setting.


3v0
I looked at it and didn't read past this B.S.:
"The main problem with using an iron is that it is not a well controlled heating device and pressure applied can be a total variable from person to person, so we're going to have you calibrate your iron specifically for your weight! Yes, you are going to be applying your entire body weight to the iron and that will now change the this 'variable' into a 'constant'."
Rolf is offline  
Old 8th August 2009, 06:47 PM   #207
Default

Looks like there is more then plenty of BS here too.

Quote:
I can't stomach all the ambiguity in information on the Pulsar site, and I only saw one reference to temperature, 275°F
Quite a bit of negativity given that you did not bother to scan the rest of the page. Snap to judgment comes to mind.

In the real world it does not much matter if what one writes is true or not. If enough people spread enough bull others will take it as fact.

3v0
__________________
Please post questions to the forums. PM's are for personal communication.

BCHS/3v0's Tutorials
Junebug USB PIC programmer kit., USB Bit Whacker,
The 15 Minute Printed Circuit Board! (+drill time)
3v0 is offline  
Old 8th August 2009, 07:09 PM   #208
Default

toner used in photocopying took almost double the time in transferring than the toner used in hp P1006 laser printer
__________________
Rεσllγ !!! Mγ Σ×ρer!ence is Directly Propotional τΘ the NΦ of Electronic Items I have Me§§eD µρ ...
tariq7868 is offline  
Old 8th August 2009, 07:44 PM   #209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tariq7868 View Post
toner used in photocopying took almost double the time in transferring than the toner used in hp P1006 laser printer
That is interesting.......
Rolf is offline  
Old 8th August 2009, 07:53 PM   #210
Default

To add to the confusion. I crank my iron to the max when using the photo paper, but apparently this is too hot for Pulsar paper and gives me squished lines. I don't know the specific iron temp and I have not tried the Pulsar paper again using lower temps, yet.

So, the useful temperature may not only be based on the toner you are using, but the 'paper' you are using as well.
__________________
Mark Higgins
DirtyLude is offline  
Reply

Tags
cheap, diy, easy, paper, toner, transfer

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar
Title Starter Forum Replies Latest
Toner Transfer PCB... Possible on this? Franknstein Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews 31 11th November 2009 10:13 PM
PCB toner transfer Badar General Electronics Chat 58 16th July 2009 02:40 PM
Toner Transfer paper, UK HerbertMunch General Electronics Chat 15 1st December 2007 04:01 PM
toner transfer with silicone impreg paper justDIY General Electronics Chat 28 13th March 2007 11:33 PM
toner paper nye Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews 8 27th October 2006 10:23 PM



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:28 AM.


Electronic Circuits  |  Learning Electronics
eXTReMe Tracker