![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| General Electronics Chat This forum is for general chat about electronics, eg: Dont know what a part does? Dont know how to read a circuit? Want to get an opinion? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
(permalink) |
|
I have seen many circuits using the 2N2222 transistor (correct me if it isn't one). one of them uses it to control electrical appliances. It says it can be substituted by a BC148. So I just wanted to know can the BC148 be used as a general substitute for 2N2222 or is it just the case in this one?
Here's the schematic http://www.electronic-circuits-diagr...rsimages/1.gif Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance
__________________
Help me enlarge my army, Click Here! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
hi, You can get both datasheets from DatasheetArchive :: Free Datasheet Search Engine :: Electronic Components and compare the specification. Check the Ic's max rating, 100mA BC148 and 600mA for the 2N2222 Last edited by ericgibbs; 4th July 2008 at 12:51 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
The 2N2222 can be replaced without problems by the BC337. The 2N2222 has a TO18A package (similar to TO92, but metal can) and the BC337 has a TO92 package. That one can handle up to 800mA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
@ashfaqueahmadbari
You may use 2N3904
__________________
Regards, Sarma. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
The BC148 was used 44 years ago. I have some. It has discontinued about 34 years ago.
The latest one is the BC548 in a TO-92 case. The 2N3904 is the same but its collector and emitter are reversed. Use a 2N4401 if you want the same high output current of an old 2N2222.
__________________
Uncle $crooge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Im a big fan of the 2N4401!
Also, just incase your ever wondering, the 2N4403 is a good pnp solution with similar specs
__________________
Spency. PIC Micro's - Your mind is the limit PIC's and interfacing with other devices - a PIC Basic Guide @ digital-diy.net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
If you need to drive lots of current, use a ZTX649, but I would not reccomend it as it is very expensive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
It also has a slightly lower GBWP but this isn't important here.
__________________
I also post at the following sites: http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com Screen name: Aloone_Jonez |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
I wonder where you live? If you cannot find 2N series there then you never cannot find a BC148 series out there.
The BC148 is very old as Audio mentioned but 2N series is commonly available. Last edited by Gayan Soyza; 7th July 2008 at 09:29 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
They may be commonly available where you are, but BC series transistors are commonly available in Europe, which is where they come from - far easier than non-European 2N series.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
the 2N2222 and likes are also made In India and from Taiwan. Industrial usage, they prefer metal can and for commercial, TO92.
__________________
Regards, Sarma. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Nothing to worry where the transistors came from.Job,price & availability is more important.
2N series more common than some BC series (BC148) including OP has "seen many circuits using the 2N2222 transistor" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Help me enlarge my army, Click Here! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Latest |
| 2N2222 Output Characteristic | Harros | Datasheet/Parts Requests | 1 | 8th March 2008 02:08 AM |
| Possible to Replace 2N7000 with 2N2907/2N2222? | Krumlink | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 16 | 4th January 2008 07:05 PM |
| 2n2222 | watzmann | General Electronics Chat | 14 | 18th December 2007 01:20 AM |
| What is best BC547 or 2N2222? | Suraj143 | Micro Controllers | 9 | 1st November 2007 07:37 AM |
| An optoisolator replacement for 2n2222 | William At MyBlueRoom | General Electronics Chat | 2 | 14th May 2006 04:51 AM |