Electronic Projects, forums and more.

Go Back   Electronic Circuits Projects Diagrams Free > Electronics Forums > General Electronics Chat


General Electronics Chat This forum is for general chat about electronics, eg: Dont know what a part does? Dont know how to read a circuit? Want to get an opinion?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15th June 2008, 09:59 PM   (permalink)
Default Inductor Self-Resonance Frequency: What's high enough?

Wikipedia says the self-resonance frequency (SRF) of an inductor is the point where it ceases to function as an inductor. Right now I have a 180MHz circuit, and a choice of inductors with SCFs ranging from 240MHz to 1.8GHz.

I'm guessing the 240MHz components are too close. In general, what SRF range do you shoot for if you already know your operating frequency? Two or three times higher?
__________________
The most-hated young engineer in America.
* AVR Projects
* Robot War: TI
* About
DigiTan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2008, 10:21 PM   (permalink)
Default

What are you building?

If it's an oscillator then just use a smaller tuning capacitor to compensate for it.

You can figure out the parasitic capacitance by rearanging the formula for capacitance.
__________________
I also post at the following sites:
http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com
Screen name: Aloone_Jonez
Hero999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2008, 11:28 PM   (permalink)
Default

It's going in a tank circuit in an FM Transmitter. The vendor's impedance vs. frequency graphs didn't cover my inductance range, so I can't really base an accurate estimate off what I saw there. Until, I do I was hoping there might be some rule of thumb for avoiding low self-resonance frequencies. Like should I operate under half the SRF or something like that?
__________________
The most-hated young engineer in America.
* AVR Projects
* Robot War: TI
* About
DigiTan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2008, 11:38 PM   (permalink)
Default

I would guess the SRF is a very high Q two-pole peak. As such, significant phase shift will be present +/- one octave of SRF. I would say at least a factor of 2 if phase is of any importance.
speakerguy79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2008, 11:56 PM   (permalink)
Default

I do not know of any rule of thumb (how many rules can a thumb hold anyways), but I would say. just operate under the SRF with margin.
Mikebits is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2008, 02:19 AM   (permalink)
Default

How many rules must a thumb hold
before you can call it a thumb.....
speakerguy79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2008, 03:37 AM   (permalink)
Default

Just make your own coil with thick wire and air as its core. Nearly every FM transmitter project has one made like that.
__________________
Uncle $crooge
audioguru is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2008, 04:30 AM   (permalink)
Default

Well, only thing is I'm buying those surface-mount chip inductors in the size 2012 packages. I suppose I could sub a hand-wound one in the prototype. The others are using SMT inductors.
__________________
The most-hated young engineer in America.
* AVR Projects
* Robot War: TI
* About
DigiTan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2008, 07:38 AM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DigiTan View Post
It's going in a tank circuit in an FM Transmitter. The vendor's impedance vs. frequency graphs didn't cover my inductance range, so I can't really base an accurate estimate off what I saw there.
If it is a new design, why would it matter what the self resonant frequency is, as long as it is higher than your operating frequency. In a tank circuit, it's like getting part of your capacitance for free. I'd just check to make sure that the self capacitance is stable with temperature, and that its value is stays consistent from part to part and batch to batch.
Bob Scott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2008, 09:12 AM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DigiTan View Post
Well, only thing is I'm buying those surface-mount chip inductors in the size 2012 packages. I suppose I could sub a hand-wound one in the prototype. The others are using SMT inductors.
Doesn't sound a good idea to use commercial SM inductors, use a simple handwound air cored coil.

Inductance isn't the only thing you need to be concerned about.
__________________
PIC programmer software, and PIC Tutorials at:
http://www.winpicprog.co.uk
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2008, 07:19 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Scott View Post
If it is a new design, why would it matter what the self resonant frequency is, as long as it is higher than your operating frequency. In a tank circuit, it's like getting part of your capacitance for free. I'd just check to make sure that the self capacitance is stable with temperature, and that its value is stays consistent from part to part and batch to batch.
Exactly, I suppose the only problem is that the Q might be low if you're relying too much on the parasitic capacitance.

Calulate the resonant requency you desire, using F0 = 1/root(LC), then transpose it for C, make F0 the self resonant frequency and subtract it from the capacitance you desire.

For example, suppose you want have a 100nH coil with a SRF of 250MHz and you want a resonant frequency of 107MHz. Ignore the SRF for now and calculate the value of capacitor requred for 100MHz, 22pF, now work out the parasitic capacitance, 4pF so use an 18pF capacitor.
__________________
I also post at the following sites:
http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com
Screen name: Aloone_Jonez
Hero999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008, 05:56 AM   (permalink)
Default

I'll probably just go with the 1.8GHz SRF inductor. I can still get an SMT model with a 5% tolerance. I can borrow a C meter, so parasitic capacitance isn't nearly as important right now as finding an accurate inductor. And incidentally, the 1.8GHz inductor has a higher Q than all the ones with the lower SRFs.
__________________
The most-hated young engineer in America.
* AVR Projects
* Robot War: TI
* About
DigiTan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008, 11:17 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DigiTan View Post
I'll probably just go with the 1.8GHz SRF inductor. I can still get an SMT model with a 5% tolerance. I can borrow a C meter, so parasitic capacitance isn't nearly as important right now as finding an accurate inductor. And incidentally, the 1.8GHz inductor has a higher Q than all the ones with the lower SRFs.
And when this approach falls flat on its face you'll probably go back and wind an air core coil.
__________________
We never have time to do it right; but we always have time to do it over.
Papabravo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008, 11:37 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
And when this approach falls flat on its face you'll probably go back and wind an air core coil.
How many air wound coils do you see in a PCS cell phone?

@1.8 Gig the PCB traces become inductors. much care must be taken.

Last edited by Mikebits; 18th June 2008 at 11:41 PM.
Mikebits is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008, 12:45 AM   (permalink)
Default

I misread the post, I was thinking 1.8GHz, but even 240 MHz is tricky.
Mikebits is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Latest
High Voltage, high frequency?! jdahl General Electronics Chat 58 3rd February 2008 03:38 PM
High frequency SMPS Firnagzen Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews 2 8th April 2007 06:20 AM
What is high frequency ? Electrolinux Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews 5 6th September 2006 02:11 AM
High current inductor Oznog Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews 0 28th November 2005 07:37 AM
Creating high frequency waves with low frequency crystals loopy Micro Controllers 5 14th February 2005 07:57 AM



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:42 AM.


Electronic Circuits  |  Electronics Wiki
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.