![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| General Electronics Chat This forum is for general chat about electronics, eg: Dont know what a part does? Dont know how to read a circuit? Want to get an opinion? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Wikipedia says the self-resonance frequency (SRF) of an inductor is the point where it ceases to function as an inductor. Right now I have a 180MHz circuit, and a choice of inductors with SCFs ranging from 240MHz to 1.8GHz.
I'm guessing the 240MHz components are too close. In general, what SRF range do you shoot for if you already know your operating frequency? Two or three times higher? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
What are you building?
If it's an oscillator then just use a smaller tuning capacitor to compensate for it. You can figure out the parasitic capacitance by rearanging the formula for capacitance.
__________________
I also post at the following sites: http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com Screen name: Aloone_Jonez |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
It's going in a tank circuit in an FM Transmitter. The vendor's impedance vs. frequency graphs didn't cover my inductance range, so I can't really base an accurate estimate off what I saw there. Until, I do I was hoping there might be some rule of thumb for avoiding low self-resonance frequencies. Like should I operate under half the SRF or something like that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
I would guess the SRF is a very high Q two-pole peak. As such, significant phase shift will be present +/- one octave of SRF. I would say at least a factor of 2 if phase is of any importance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
I do not know of any rule of thumb (how many rules can a thumb hold anyways), but I would say. just operate under the SRF with margin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
How many rules must a thumb hold
before you can call it a thumb..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Just make your own coil with thick wire and air as its core. Nearly every FM transmitter project has one made like that.
__________________
Uncle $crooge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Well, only thing is I'm buying those surface-mount chip inductors in the size 2012 packages. I suppose I could sub a hand-wound one in the prototype. The others are using SMT inductors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
If it is a new design, why would it matter what the self resonant frequency is, as long as it is higher than your operating frequency. In a tank circuit, it's like getting part of your capacitance for free. I'd just check to make sure that the self capacitance is stable with temperature, and that its value is stays consistent from part to part and batch to batch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
Inductance isn't the only thing you need to be concerned about. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
Calulate the resonant requency you desire, using F0 = 1/root(LC), then transpose it for C, make F0 the self resonant frequency and subtract it from the capacitance you desire. For example, suppose you want have a 100nH coil with a SRF of 250MHz and you want a resonant frequency of 107MHz. Ignore the SRF for now and calculate the value of capacitor requred for 100MHz, 22pF, now work out the parasitic capacitance, 4pF so use an 18pF capacitor.
__________________
I also post at the following sites: http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com Screen name: Aloone_Jonez |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
I'll probably just go with the 1.8GHz SRF inductor. I can still get an SMT model with a 5% tolerance. I can borrow a C meter, so parasitic capacitance isn't nearly as important right now as finding an accurate inductor. And incidentally, the 1.8GHz inductor has a higher Q than all the ones with the lower SRFs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
__________________
We never have time to do it right; but we always have time to do it over. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
@1.8 Gig the PCB traces become inductors. much care must be taken. Last edited by Mikebits; 18th June 2008 at 11:41 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
I misread the post, I was thinking 1.8GHz, but even 240 MHz is tricky.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Latest |
| High Voltage, high frequency?! | jdahl | General Electronics Chat | 58 | 3rd February 2008 03:38 PM |
| High frequency SMPS | Firnagzen | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 2 | 8th April 2007 06:20 AM |
| What is high frequency ? | Electrolinux | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 5 | 6th September 2006 02:11 AM |
| High current inductor | Oznog | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 0 | 28th November 2005 07:37 AM |
| Creating high frequency waves with low frequency crystals | loopy | Micro Controllers | 5 | 14th February 2005 07:57 AM |