![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| | |||||||
| General Electronics Chat This forum is for general chat about electronics, eg: Dont know what a part does? Dont know how to read a circuit? Want to get an opinion? |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | (permalink) |
| For example; circuit A have 12 transistor circuit B have 6 transistor both circuit produce the same result. What is the disadvantage of having many transistor? Need a general answer.. hope someone can forward me some link that i can prove with mathematical equation. | |
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
It really depends upon the circuit and the types of transistor. Do you have example circuits you could post.?
__________________ Eric "Good enough is Perfect" PIC tutorials: Gramo's: www.digital-diy.net/ Bill's: www.blueroomelectronics.com/ | ||
| |
| | (permalink) |
| A general response - more parts is likely to result in more opportunities for error and greater difficulty in achieving high reliability. The "math" is likely related to reliability.
__________________ stevez | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| As stevez said, the more parts there are the more likely there will be a failure, so the reliablity will be lower. However, it could be that the simple solution produces a marginal design that does not work quite as well as the more complex solution. JimB
__________________ Experience is directly proportional to the value of the equipment ruined. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| There is another twist to the fact that more parts lead to a greater chance for failure of a single part. If the additional parts are for redundancy, i.e. tolerance tolerance, then the chance that a part failure will result in loss of critical function can be reduced. John | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| jpanhalt touches on something that would be nice to convey to many who come here to this forum. Intuitively, simple is better but only to a point. Many people post here wanting a simple circuit but become frustrated when simple isn't getting the job done. A goal of good design would be the simplest circuit that addresses all of the issues. A good example for beginners is possibly a look at 3 terminal adjustable voltage regulators like the LM317. Quite often the circuit depicted has a very few parts. A good review of the datasheet reveals additional parts and an explanation for their purpose. An example might be the addition of a diode to prevent a capacitor on the output from damaging the regulator.
__________________ stevez | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| You can state your requirements in any of a number of ways, but there is no way to get to done, without doing this first.
__________________ We never have time to do it right; but we always have time to do it over. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| A schema would be handy. Perhaps you mean that a circuits is driven via discrete darlington transistors, will double the amount of transisitors but lower the burdon on the driver stages, and improve the gain.
__________________ There are more ways to get to Rome. Electricity, Electric clocks, Meters and Trains are great. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| An excellent audio amplifier has many transistors. A very poor audio amplifier has only a few transistors. The results are certainly not the same.
__________________ Uncle $crooge | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Transistorized Radio receivers of yesteryears used to contain this as AD & business gimmick... 6 transistor 4 band radio Then IC packaging technology-- boast of their capability-- as years pass by, few thousand more will be adding for a unit area of the CHIP. As rightly put, circuit optimization, speaks what minimum components one uses to get a known standard of performance-- and the stability depends on quality of design. Many a times we enjoy critical analysis on circuits and their quality, and luckily how improve on them, from experts like Audioguru.
__________________ Regards, Sarma. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| When I was 12 years old, my portable AM radio had 6 transistors. My friend's radio was embossed on its cover, "14 Transistors". We looked inside his 14 transistors radio and found one transistor was the detector diode and 7 transistors were connected in a circle but were not connected to the radio circuit!
__________________ Uncle $crooge | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| I recollect, there was a radio design from Siemens in their technical literature books during 80s, entitled, "Radio with IC Maximum" In fact it had more than 12 to 13 Chips.
__________________ Regards, Sarma. | |
| |
| | (permalink) | ||||
| I will explain it with the very basic things. In general electronic, transistor circuit can be replaced by two port network. In general, transistor circuit can be replaced by "block system". I will tell you about two port network. Quote:
Quote:
Several things you should consider when considering two port network Zin, Zout, Av, and frequency response. Higher Av is resulting lower Zin and lower frequency response. Higher Zin is better when dealing with low amplitude signal. Quote:
Quote:
Sometimes the cost is expensive. | |||||
| |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Title | Starter | Forum | Replies | Latest |
| Thermal Effect on Transistors | TrevorP | General Electronics Chat | 2 | 12th November 2007 01:06 AM |
| Early (field effect) transistors, A question about... | Dawny | General Electronics Chat | 2 | 5th November 2007 03:22 PM |
| Transistors - Understanding Datasheets | UTMonkey | Datasheet/Parts Requests | 4 | 31st October 2007 02:13 PM |
| Hall Effect Sensor | bryan1 | General Electronics Chat | 1 | 16th September 2005 09:21 AM |
| overheating transistors | MsStateDawg | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 3 | 9th January 2004 05:49 PM |