Hei there.
I`m wondering, whats the differences of sending 4000V 50 Hz through a long cabel, and 4000V 400Hz through the same cabel, the load on the end is not to much..

 

Hi jdahl,

the only difference is the fact, that transforming the high voltage to normal 230V less iron is required for the transformer at higher frequencies.

In aviation the generators normally supply a 400Hz voltage which is transformed to 24 or 48V feeding all aviation electronics and hydraulic acutators thus saving weight.

On land lines high voltages are used to reduce the current flow resulting in less losses.

Boncuk

 

Well... it's easier for you to send 50Hz because your mains supply is already at that frequency and you would just step up the voltage with a transformer...
I'm sure there would be some interference caused on devices by sending 400Hz through a long cable... It would help if it was shielded.

Edit: If you do decide to switch it at 400Hz, you baisically have a switchmode power supply on your hands, and you need to reconvert it back to AC... it would be easy to keep it a square wave but then you are complicating things if you want to filter it out back to a sine.

__________________
What is a joule per second?

 

Thanks guys,
The weight issue exsplains it... there are limited space at the end, so thanks for the help.

 

The real question is why do we use 50/60Hz and not 400Hz on the mains. I think it's historical and a legacy issue. Not sure though

 

Isn't it due to the required speed of the generators?.

__________________
PIC programmer software, and PIC Tutorials at:
http://www.winpicprog.co.uk

 

Ah, yeah that could be it. Those massive generators probably have a speed limit.

 

They could always add more poles which brings us back to it being legacy.

Mike.

 

But could you add 8 times as many poles? - I suspect it's probably a question of a happy medium between the different alternatives.

__________________
PIC programmer software, and PIC Tutorials at:
http://www.winpicprog.co.uk

 

It's cheaper, it's already there, everything uses it!

 

Forgive me for not googling this, but I have often wondered how the mains are kept so accurate as far as frequency goes. Isn't the frequency all in the speed the generators are turning?

I have wondered how the US settled on 60Hz mains. Why not a round number like the rest of the world?

__________________

 

There are many countries who use 60Hz.. not just the US.. many who use 50Hz... and they are both "round" numbers.

 

Apart from the historical and a legacy issue, there are tecnical reasons:

>>>> The inductive reactance of the long power lines (and capacitive reactance in the underground cables):

With 400 Hz the series inductive reactance is higher (reactance = inductance x 2 x Pi x frecuency), giving more voltage drop.

And the paralel capacitive reactance is lower, which gives more leakage current.

>>>> 400 Hz is well into the audio spectrum, so a 400 Hz grid (and its harmonics) should cause more interference in "plain old analog" telephone circuits.

__________________
E Cerfoglio
Buenos Aires
Argentina

 

The mains' frecuency is the timing reference of the "electical clocks":

Once upon a time they were sincronous motors driving a mecanical clock,

Nowadays there are lots of electronic clocks that use the mains cero crossing as a reference: standalone clocks, microwave ovens, VCRs, etc.

The frecuency may have a little short term drift, but the utilities correct it in the long term comparing an "electrical clock" with a good time reference.

__________________
E Cerfoglio
Buenos Aires
Argentina

 

Could the higher 'skin effect' (higher line resistance) of using 400hz on very long power lines Vs 50/60 hz be a factor in selecting the lower frequency for power distrubution?

Lefty

__________________
Measurement changes behavior