![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| | |||||||
| General Electronics Chat This forum is for general chat about electronics, eg: Dont know what a part does? Dont know how to read a circuit? Want to get an opinion? |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | (permalink) |
| Hey, I'm designing a negative LCD bias with the MC34063. I have yet to find an easy way to get hold of a current sense resistor, of 0.22 to 1 ohm. I opened up a car phone charger, and that used the same chip, but no low ohmic resistors in sight, instead I tihnk they used a PCB track 'made' of solder, or at least they covered it in solder to increase its current capability. Anyone know if I really need this resistor? or where I can get hold of one/substitute with something else? Cheers, Blueteeth
__________________ Inconsistency is the key to flexibility! | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Go to any large electronic component distributer like RS or Farnell. You could always parallel 4 1
__________________ I also post at the following sites: http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com Screen name: Aloone_Jonez And http://www.silicontronics.com, same screen name as here. | |
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
thanks Blueteeth
__________________ Inconsistency is the key to flexibility! | ||
| |
| | (permalink) |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_wire_gauge Wikipdeia says the resistance of 40 AWG wire has a resistance of 3543.307/km so 0.1 How much current does this have to take? I wouldn't use it for more than 50mA or so.
__________________ I also post at the following sites: http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com Screen name: Aloone_Jonez And http://www.silicontronics.com, same screen name as here. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Hey, thanks again, for 0.22 (just to be sure) that would need, by my calculations, 62mm Being an LCD bias, it can't be more than a few mA, the data sheet specifies '4mA max', so I guess 6 would be enough to cover it. Thats on the output though, which should probably be about -18V. Rough guess at input current.. 35mA max. so I won't need a big inductor or anything, and I'm sure the wire would do just fine. I have just desoldered a few 0.1R's and 0.01Rs from a old broken motherboard these should do, although I'm completely ignorant when it comes to working out the value for the Rsense (reading the datasheet over and over still). Cheers for the tips, and sorry for bringing such a basic quesiton to the forums, but you know, thinking 'out loud' (or typing it) helps with the process Blueteeth edit: just worked out the Rsense value. I think I'll just use good 'ol trial and error, with a pot on the output to adjust the load. Measuring the voltage output, and adjusting the pot should provide a fairly accurate cut off output current (god bless V=IR). And I'll just keep reducing rsense until its sweet...first SMPS design right here
__________________ Inconsistency is the key to flexibility! Last edited by Blueteeth; 3rd March 2007 at 12:58 AM. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Digi-Key has sensing resistors in the range you want. | |
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
__________________ I also post at the following sites: http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com Screen name: Aloone_Jonez And http://www.silicontronics.com, same screen name as here. | ||
| |
| | (permalink) |
| hi blueteeth, If you prefer to wind your low value resistor, you can use a 0.125W resistor as the winding former. Just solder your wire to one end, wind on the 62mm, and solder the wire end to the other end of the resistor. The standard 0.05 thru 1 I have see 0.1 and 0.2 EriG | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Winding it on a former is a good idea as long as you are aware of the fact that it will increase the inductance significantly.
__________________ I also post at the following sites: http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com Screen name: Aloone_Jonez And http://www.silicontronics.com, same screen name as here. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Hey guys, Hero999, cheers, I'll play about with inductors, I've got a few 47uH, 100, and 220's, one of those shuld work a treat, any inductance in the rsense might not make much of a difference using the above inductors (ie: the inductance of rsense is comparably small). Ericgibbs, great idea! carbon resistors would also be easy to file a groove or two in them to make things a bit neater. I love idea's like that, nothing fancy, but practical, quick, clever, simple solutions for when you're stuck on something If the addded inductance of the winding does become a problem, I could just wind a caduceus/bifilar winding. Cheers guys, I'll let you know how I get on! Blueteeth
__________________ Inconsistency is the key to flexibility! | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| hi blueteeth, You don't need to file grooves in your resistor, just double wind two wires side by side, nice and tight, on the resistor. When you have done, varnish them with a little 'ladies nail lacquer' it works fine. The colour is optional!. When its almost dry, carefully remove one of the windings, leaving a wire diameter spacing on the permanent wire. As you say, if you want minimum inductance, bifilar would be OK. If you are using tinned copper wire, you can stretch it, within limits, to increase its resistance per meter. EricG | |
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
Now wheres my nailvarnish.... Blueteeth
__________________ Inconsistency is the key to flexibility! | ||
| |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Title | Starter | Forum | Replies | Latest |
| Expert Stabilised Power Supply with Current Limiting | mechie | Electronic Projects | 36 | 11th March 2008 08:16 PM |
| Voltage | ElectroMaster | Electronic Theory | 44 | 8th August 2007 06:35 PM |
| Current and Conductivity | ElectroMaster | Electronic Theory | 1 | 2nd February 2007 01:50 PM |
| Problems with Dual Brightness (Current) LED Tail Lights? Eagle Schematics! | Ocelaris | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 12 | 31st December 2006 07:18 PM |
| Pratical op amp design - voltage and current sense | Justanotherproject | General Electronics Chat | 5 | 20th January 2004 08:45 PM |