sstimuluss

Hi, I've asked this question before re a project, however the discusion was side-tracked, so would like to ask again. Please, I would really appreciate it if someone could explain how this could be implemented, or why it isn't possible.

I have multiple identical resistive touch-switch circuits. They each draw about 60mA max (basically driving LED's).
They are to be operated simultaneously by the same person
If the circuits share one 9v supply, the current running to the touch switches is shared and divided.
If each touch circuit has its own 9v supply, the current doesnt seem to be shared.
Why is this?
I've tried to illustrate with simple circuit diagram below. Skin resistance values are arbitrary.

My question is _not_ regarding touch switches per se, but rather how to create multiple voltage sources with one voltage source so that current is not crossing over in the skin "resistor bridge".
Please help

Attached Images

single vs multiple.jpg (50.7 KB, 34 views)

Russlk

I don't understand the problem: why do you care?

__________________
see my website: www.geocities.com/russlk

sstimuluss

It matters for my application because with each touch switch the amount of touch (ie. resistance at skin contact point) controls the amount of current running through the LED, ie. brightness. This brightness in turn affects a light dependent resistor, which in turn affects a midi controller value.

If the touch circuits are run off the same voltage source, touching one switch, and then simultaneously touching another, affects the brightness (and therefore midi controller values) of the first switch.
If the touch circuits are run off seperate voltage sources, then more than one can be operated by the same person without affecting one another.

I call them touch switches, but they are really acting as variable resistors where amount of skin contact at each electrode affects resistance.

Russlk

I don't know how you determined the currents in your diagram, but 9 volts is 9 volts, it does not matter if it is one source or two. In order for the currents to be different, there has to be more in the circuit than is shown.

__________________
see my website: www.geocities.com/russlk

sstimuluss

Nope, the currents are calculated with TinaPro DC circuit emulation.
I've also tried this on the breadboard.

I'm guessing the reason they differ is that the skin acts as resistor bridge, so with one voltage source, the resistances representing contact with V+ act as one, and thus the current is split at the skin's central point.

Russlk

You have a strange simulator. I ran the two circuits in SwitcherCad and the currents, except for the batteries, are identical in both cases.

__________________
see my website: www.geocities.com/russlk

sstimuluss

hmmm.. well thanks for trying it out on your sim.. are you sure you had the exact same circuits? My simulations match what happens on the breadboard when I build the two circuits.

I don't just have two supplies in parallel, the sub-circuits are seperately powered and the only place they meet is in the skin.

If you try it on the breadboard(if you have time that is , you'll see what I mean. With one supply, touching one affects the other, with separate supplies, they dont.

Attached Images

multiple expanded.jpg (50.5 KB, 6 views)

Roff

My simulatorgives me an error message if I don't have a ground in each independent circuit in the schematic. Try adding grounds on your emitters and see if the simulator gives you more believable results.

__________________
Ron

sstimuluss

ron H - i tried your suggestion, and see that it changes the relationship between currents running to the two bases, but I don't understand why you would have a common ground for two circuits running off seperate batteries

regardless of what sims are doing with those circuits, try building it.. you will see.. I'm not just being stubborn, I've actually tested this out, but don't understand it all that much.

Roff

Have you actually tried building two circuits, and testing those same two circuits first with separate batteries, and then with a common battery?
The reason I ask is that each circuit is dependent on the beta of its transistor. Unless you test the same circuits in both battery configurations, your results would be expected to be different.
Also, can you just draw the circuits without the skin resistors? Just show the contacts, with dashed lines showing where the "skin resistance" will be applied.

__________________
Ron

sstimuluss

i cant remember whether i tested this with the same two transistors, but the actual current readings are not that important, more important is that fact that the two touch circuits affect each other when one battery is used.

with one battery, LED1 dims when LED2 is also activated
with two batteries, LED1 stays the same brightness when LED2 is also activated

thanks for taking interest in this btw

Attached Images

single vs multiple 2.jpg (29.9 KB, 6 views)

Roff

I'm guessing it's due to battery internal resistance, which probably goes up as the voltage goes down. What kind of 9V battery are you using?

__________________
Ron

sstimuluss

cheap 9v alkaline..

also, the transistors aren't really essential to demonstrate the effect.. the following circuit yields similar ""independance" with seperate batteries, even though the resistors are joined at a common point.

could you please elaborate on how battery resistance relates to this? think i'm missing something fundamental..

Attached Images

single vs multiple simplified.jpg (23.5 KB, 2 views)

Russlk

Good call, Ron. I am sure that if one emitter is grounded and the other is allowed to float, the results will be much different!

__________________
see my website: www.geocities.com/russlk

Roff

I agree that the 3 voltages will be different in this shematic.
I wonder if your previous schematic (with the transistors and the electrodes) is accurate. Do you have some connection between the two circuits when you touch them?

__________________
Ron