Electronic Projects, forums and more.

Go Back   Electronic Circuits Projects Diagrams Free > Electronics Forums > General Electronics Chat


General Electronics Chat This forum is for general chat about electronics, eg: Dont know what a part does? Dont know how to read a circuit? Want to get an opinion?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13th October 2005, 08:08 PM   (permalink)
Default Temperature effects on p-n junction diode

Hi friends;

A relatively simple question on Barrier Potential of a p-n junction diode:

The equation for the barrier potential is as follows:

Vb = Vt loge(Na*Nd/square(n)) mV
where Vt=KT/e

This equation shows that the barrier potential is directly proportional to the temperature. So as temperature increases the barrier potential should increase.

But in contradiction to this, I have found the following statement:

" With increase in temperature, more minority charge carriers are produced, leading to their increased drift across the junction. As a result, equilibrium occurs at a lower barrier potential. It is found that the Vb decreases by about 2 mV/deegre celcius. "

Please clarify the above, I will be grateful to you.

Thank you
Vaibhav
vsg22 is offline  
Old 13th October 2005, 08:50 PM   (permalink)
Default Re: Temperature effects on p-n junction diode

Quote:
Originally Posted by vsg22
Hi friends;

A relatively simple question on Barrier Potential of a p-n junction diode:

The equation for the barrier potential is as follows:

Vb = Vt loge(Na*Nd/square(n)) mV
where Vt=KT/e

This equation shows that the barrier potential is directly proportional to the temperature. So as temperature increases the barrier potential should increase.

But in contradiction to this, I have found the following statement:

" With increase in temperature, more minority charge carriers are produced, leading to their increased drift across the junction. As a result, equilibrium occurs at a lower barrier potential. It is found that the Vb decreases by about 2 mV/deegre celcius. "

Please clarify the above, I will be grateful to you.

Thank you
Vaibhav
I'm not sure and have not looked it up but you might be missing a saturation current term (Is) which, is _usually_ very small to what is being considered and hence ignored. However, it is a much stronger function of temperature that overcomes the directly proportional relationship in the KT/e term.
Optikon is offline  
Old 14th October 2005, 10:46 AM   (permalink)
Default

Look at it in this way
Law of mass action states that the product of concentrations of electrons and holes is always constant at a fixed temperature
(ni)^2=n*p where i is subscript
Again this law is applicable to extrinsic semiconductors.
The n in the denominator is actually (ni)intrinsic carrer concentration. Since you are increasing the temperature the value of (ni) will increase more as it is also temperature dependent.
Hence reducing the value of the potential barrier Vb
__________________
Artificial Neural Networks are dangerous to mankind
electronist is offline  
Old 14th October 2005, 08:11 PM   (permalink)
Default

btw if you don't mind me sidetracking a moment. would increasing the temperature of a diode cause it to produce electricity ?
__________________
I AM the exeption that disproves the rule in many ways but the rules still apply (unfortunately)

my site:www.simons-photography.com
http://rushdenrotaract.org.uk
Thunderchild is offline  
Old 14th October 2005, 08:25 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderchild
btw if you don't mind me sidetracking a moment. would increasing the temperature of a diode cause it to produce electricity ?
If you heat one of the junctions and cool the other then yes
__________________
Nothing is impossible.
Once a problem is realised, the rest is just details


Styx is offline  
Old 14th October 2005, 08:32 PM   (permalink)
Default

then i should connect two diodes together and put one in the cold and one in the hot ? how do i connect them ? pn-pn, pn-np or np-pn ?
__________________
I AM the exeption that disproves the rule in many ways but the rules still apply (unfortunately)

my site:www.simons-photography.com
http://rushdenrotaract.org.uk
Thunderchild is offline  
Old 14th October 2005, 09:25 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
If you heat one of the junctions and cool the other then yes
No you cannot heat one junction and cool the other. That can be done in metals ( i.e the thermocouple action)

Quote:
would increasing the temperature of a diode cause it to produce electricity
heating of a semiconductor can cause valence electrons to acquire more energy to break their bonds and enter the conduction band in case of both intrinsic and extrinsic semiconductors. Under open lead condition the direction of flow of electrons or holes is random and hence net current produced is zero. Again no amount of heating can cause a semiconductor to overcome its potential barrier. Too much heat will simply destroy the semiconductor.
But when connected to a proper ckt and proper biasing is done then the current flowing through the diode will depend on the supply and the temperature.
__________________
Artificial Neural Networks are dangerous to mankind
electronist is offline  
Old 14th October 2005, 10:21 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by electronist
Quote:
If you heat one of the junctions and cool the other then yes
No you cannot heat one junction and cool the other. That can be done in metals ( i.e the thermocouple action)
Except there is devices out there that work on this priciple. BUT the doping area is bigger.

IF you could practically heat one area and cool the other then current would flow. BUT in hte size of a regular PN junction this isn't really possible
__________________
Nothing is impossible.
Once a problem is realised, the rest is just details


Styx is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes





All times are GMT. The time now is 07:11 AM.


Electronic Circuits  |  Learning Electronics
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

eXTReMe Tracker