<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Electronic Circuits Projects Diagrams Free - Electronic Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.electro-tech-online.com/</link>
		<description>Basic principles, ideas, concepts, laws, and formulas behind electronics.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:01:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>identifying the correct point of Ic(sat)</title>
			<link>http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/100188-identifying-correct-point-ic-sat.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:12:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>i am doing an experiment on the dc characteristics of the BJT and have drawn the output characteristic curve for values of IB=20uA and IB=50uA (Refer...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>i am doing an experiment on the dc characteristics of the BJT and have drawn the output characteristic curve for values of IB=20uA and IB=50uA (Refer to attachment)<br />
<br />
In order to find the beta of the transistor, I take Ic(sat) / Ib.<br />
Referring to the 2 points of the graph i have circled in the attached pic, which point should I take for Ic(sat)? The point where the curve starts to become horizontal <b>[black box]</b> or the point right at the end (highest point of Ic) <b><font color="Red">[red box]</font></b>?<br />
<br />
help is extremely appreciated. thanks=)</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Thumbnails</legend>
			<div style="padding:3px">
			
<a href="http://www.electro-tech-online.com/attachments/electronic-theory/35455d1258549495-identifying-correct-point-ic-sat-untitled-picture.png" rel="Lightbox_813721" id="attachment35455"><img class="thumbnail" src="http://www.electro-tech-online.com/attachments/electronic-theory/35455d1258549495t-identifying-correct-point-ic-sat-untitled-picture.png" border="0" alt="Click image for larger version

Name:	Untitled picture.png
Views:	N/A
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	35455" /></a>
&nbsp;

			</div>
		</fieldset>
	

	

	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/">Electronic Theory</category>
			<dc:creator>qtommer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/100188-identifying-correct-point-ic-sat.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Power = ½ V² / R ?</title>
			<link>http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/100050-power-v-r.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:58:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I sometimes see in some places that power is defined as ½ V² / R. 
 
Where does the ½ come from?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I sometimes see in some places that power is defined as ½ V² / R.<br />
<br />
Where does the ½ come from?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/">Electronic Theory</category>
			<dc:creator>alphacat</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/100050-power-v-r.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Horizontal vs Vertial Polarization</title>
			<link>http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/99841-horizontal-vs-vertial-polarization.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:57:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[If I'm not mistaken most television broadcast chanels are vertically polarized, yet all the yagi's I see on rooftops are horizontally polarized, can...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>If I'm not mistaken most television broadcast chanels are vertically polarized, yet all the yagi's I see on rooftops are horizontally polarized, can someone explain this?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/">Electronic Theory</category>
			<dc:creator>Sceadwian</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/99841-horizontal-vs-vertial-polarization.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>simple idial ressistor question..</title>
			<link>http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/99753-simple-idial-ressistor-question.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:39:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>a simple resistor ( which is designated as broken line) has 2 ohms 
why we say it linear and time invariant. 
the function of the resistor if ...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>a simple resistor ( which is designated as broken line) has 2 ohms<br />
why we say it linear and time invariant.<br />
the function of the resistor if <br />
f(t)=2<br />
<br />
f(x+y)=2  but f(x)+f(y)=4<br />
additive therefore its not linear.<br />
<br />
where is  my mistake?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/">Electronic Theory</category>
			<dc:creator>transgalactic</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/99753-simple-idial-ressistor-question.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>graph sum question..</title>
			<link>http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/99751-graph-sum-question.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:19:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://i34.tinypic.com/bi10z9.gif 
i cant understand how they sum those three graphs. 
when we sum graph 2 and 3 we get graph 3 lifted by a certain...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://i34.tinypic.com/bi10z9.gif" target="_blank">http://i34.tinypic.com/bi10z9.gif</a><br />
i cant understand how they sum those three graphs.<br />
when we sum graph 2 and 3 we get graph 3 lifted by a certain number.<br />
but when we add graph 1 to the result<br />
on point where the current is 0 the voltage is from 0 to -infinity.<br />
before that current 0 that is no points,so on that section it cannot affect the <br />
result graph<br />
but it does  .<br />
why?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/">Electronic Theory</category>
			<dc:creator>transgalactic</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/99751-graph-sum-question.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>components graph question..</title>
			<link>http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/99750-components-graph-question.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:04:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://i38.tinypic.com/xdxsuv.gif 
 
1. 
i know that a diode is short circuit when the currect threw it is positive 
and open circuit other wise 
...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://i38.tinypic.com/xdxsuv.gif" target="_blank">http://i38.tinypic.com/xdxsuv.gif</a><br />
<br />
1.<br />
i know that a diode is short circuit when the currect threw it is positive<br />
and open circuit other wise<br />
<br />
but the graph of it says<br />
 when the current goes from zero till infinity<br />
the voltage is zero (which is fine)<br />
<br />
but <br />
that on current 0 the voltage goes from zero till minus  infinity<br />
<br />
what does it mean &quot; zero till minus  infinity&quot;?<br />
  <br />
i cant see how it means open circuit<br />
<br />
2.<br />
why a battery gives a constant voltage no matter the current?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/">Electronic Theory</category>
			<dc:creator>transgalactic</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/99750-components-graph-question.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>physical explanation  question..</title>
			<link>http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/99586-physical-explanation-question.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>why when when we connect  capacitators in a row(not paralel) 
the capacitance  gets smaller 
 
i need the physical explanation for it</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>why when when we connect  capacitators in a row(not paralel)<br />
the capacitance  gets smaller<br />
<br />
i need the physical explanation for it</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/">Electronic Theory</category>
			<dc:creator>transgalactic</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/99586-physical-explanation-question.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fourier transform and Laplace transform</title>
			<link>http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/99270-fourier-transform-laplace-transform.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:58:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm not very sure if this is the right forum to post this, but didn't find a better one. 
 
I would like to know if the Fourier transform can always...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I'm not very sure if this is the right forum to post this, but didn't find a better one.<br />
<br />
I would like to know if the Fourier transform can always be achieved by finding the Laplace transform, I'm asking because I find in a Signals &amp; Systems book, a problem that said Find the Fourier transform using the Laplace transform, well, actually it was the solution manual, and what they did was find the Laplace transform and change S for j&#969;. Is that always possible?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/">Electronic Theory</category>
			<dc:creator>Karkas</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/99270-fourier-transform-laplace-transform.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Thevenin's Theorem Practice]]></title>
			<link>http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/99126-thevenins-theorem-practice.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:13:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey Everyone, 
 
I'm terrible when it comes to Thevenin's Theorem, so I'd like some practice. Does anyone know of links or PDFs that contain a...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hey Everyone,<br />
<br />
I'm terrible when it comes to Thevenin's Theorem, so I'd like some practice. Does anyone know of links or PDFs that contain a complete explanation or Thevenin's theorem and also numerous practice problems? <br />
<br />
I'd appreciate it!<br />
<br />
Austin</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/">Electronic Theory</category>
			<dc:creator>ElectroNerdy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-theory/99126-thevenins-theorem-practice.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
