![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| | #31 | ||
| Quote:
My FACTS are based on a typical triac, say a MAC8N. At 4A you dissipate 4W per triac min. The die temperature has to be between 40C and 280C with a max of 125C (2.2C/W j-c or 62.5C/W j-a times 4W plus 30C max ambient) meaning you need heat sinking of 20C/W with proper ventilation. "And you're basing your idea" entirely on untested theory of a single app that is notorious for abuse. The fact is that for your theory to be correct the single bulb would have to conduct 100A for 2.6mS in a properly designed unit in order to have a chance of blowing the triac. (26A²S fusing per the mentioned spec sheet) Quote:
It would be much more common failure in an app like that to be either overloaded, which a club is likely to do, or the have design corners cut in the heat sinking, which substandard engineers are likely to do. If properly designed and loaded, I would still not put it past a club to prevent air circulation past the heat sink. You should probably clarify to the less knowledgeable that the 3000W is the circuit capability and not the unit capability. Last edited by Ubergeek63; 20th October 2008 at 11:45 AM. | |||
| |
| | #32 | |
| Quote:
I've done disco's, I've done PA and lights for bands - replacing failed lamps and TRIAC's is a regular part of doing so. | ||
| |
| | #33 | |
| Quote:
It is highly doubtful that all things being proper even a single 1KW bulb could draw 22KW for 2.6mS before going open circuit. It follows, therefore, that you're blaming the failure of the triacs entirely on the triacs is unfounded. It is FAR more likely that the triacs are overloaded and overheated when the bulb blows. Come to think of it, another DESIGN issue is trying to flash a cold filament from peak line voltage, bad for the bulb and would not sit well with an overheated triac. | ||
| |
| | #34 | ||
| Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Nigel Goodwin; 20th October 2008 at 04:39 PM. | |||
| |
| | #35 | |
| Quote:
How is that not blaming the triacs? | ||
| |
| | #36 | ||
| Quote:
Quote:
| |||
| |
| | #37 | |
| Quote:
The old computer saying: "garbage in, garbage out" ... or in your case "garbage out, cash in" ... if they were properly designed and utilized the triacs would not be blowing. Period. Which is what I said in the beginning. | ||
| |
| | #38 | |
| Quote:
| ||
| |
| | #39 |
| I wouldn't know... I do know that it is my experience there are many wanna be engineers in niche markets that are less than well qualified, and that your experience supports mine, though you might not like admitting it.
| |
| |
| | #40 | |
| Quote:
1. I'd say any piece of equipment that takes out a triac (and possible other components) because a light globe fails is poorly designed. Light globes are user-serviceable pieces of equipment with a limited life expectancy, and are expected to fail. If they take out semiconductors when they do, then it says to me that the designer didn't take this into account. 2. I can't see why a light globe would go short circuit when the filament breaks. How can there be a low impedance between the 2 contacts if the only part that could possibly cause a short is the filament, which is resistive. Nigel, if you could explain the mechanism that causes the light globe to become a short circuit, it could well clear up a lot of confusion. 3. Is it possible that the reason you see a lot of professional lighting equipment with a blown globe and a dead triac is because the globe failed and was never replace, and sometime later the triac, which is driving several other globes, failed for a completely unrelated reason? From what I've seen, as the number of lights in a lighting system increases, so too does the probability of having a blown globe, so I think this is possibly the reason why you see lots of dead triacs connected to blown globes. But that's really nothing more than an educated guess. 4. If this thread is any kind of measuring stick, I'm gonna like this forum, A LOT | ||
| |
| | #41 |
| What happens when the power line gets hit by lightning? I used to work on SM power supplies, and every single model that was designed to be connected to the mains had to pass a Hipot test. > 2kV between the AC input and the DC output/case. If the triacs weren't driven by an opto coupler, then the circuit would surely fail this test. The test was designed to ensure that if the power line was hit with lightning, and you were touching the unit at the time, you would be somewhat protected from a good zapping. | |
| |
| | #42 | |||
| Quote:
Quote:
Perhaps it's a characteristic of PAR36 bulbs (and similar), although normal bulbs cause it as well, but not so often - but you generally get far more PAR38's than normal bulbs fed from light systems, so it's not a fair comparison. Quote:
| ||||
| |
| | #43 | |
| Quote:
Incidently, the old saying 'lightning never strikes twice in the same place' is completely untrue, we had the exact same houses struck almost exactly a year apart - bad luck or what?. | ||
| |
| | #44 |
|
Ive experienced that too, first time the lightning struck my house - it blew my computer up (dead power pack, although the rest of it survived), a year and 2 days later the house was struck again (we were in the garden watching this wall of rain come up the street - was really freaky) and our 3 day old 52" plasma screen got zapped good and proper - never to work again, and left a big 'Y' shaped scorched mark etched into the screen. After reading this thread, i think I need to go through all my old disco gear and I have loads of effects that are no longer working - need to check the triacs on them.
__________________ There will come a day when PICs will rule the world! | |
| |
| | #45 | ||
| Quote:
) and vapourised a number of rafters. Not a single electrical item in his house survived, and he had a LOT of gear - included FOUR - yes FOUR - surround sound systems.Quote:
| |||
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |