+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2
First 1 2
Results 16 to 21 of 21

Thread: Analog One-Shot

  1. #16
    KMoffett Excellent KMoffett Excellent KMoffett Excellent KMoffett Excellent KMoffett Excellent
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis MN USA
    Posts
    1,385

    Default

    What is the significance of using a Sonalert over a different type of buzzer
    A Sonalert (brand name) is a solid state buzzer. The significants in my circuit, as some already said, is that an electromechanical "buzzer" open-circuits once every oscillation and would stop the SCR from conducting. That's why you would need a resistor across it, to maintain a conductive path. A solid state buzzer conducts continuously, so wouldn't need a parallel conductive path.

    In your simulation of my circuit, the resistor simulating the Sonalert should be in the 500 to 1K range. 100K would not allow enough current to maintain conduction in the SCR. For an electromechanical buzzer it would be in the 100 to 500Ω range. And simulated by a relay with its coil powered through its C and NC contacts. Why did you pick 1.0uF for C1 and 100K for R1? R1/C1 are only to provide a brief pulse to turn on the SCR. The values in my schematic were "bench tested" and worked. Oh, and the alarm continues until you lift your finger off the reset switch.

    any ideas on swapping the relays out for something solid state?
    There are hundreds of ways to do it with solid state circuits, but I don't think you will find one with a smaller parts-count/size than mine (actually, mvs samara's). Since your original post said "remote" you might want to add a resistor and LED across the alarm line to indicate that there still is an alarm, when the audible indicator is silenced.

    Ken
    Last edited by KMoffett; 30th October 2009 at 11:33 AM.
    "To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk."
    Thomas A. Edison (1847 - 1931)


  2. #17
    ADWSystems Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    51

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KMoffett View Post
    A Sonalert (brand name) is a solid state buzzer. The significants in my circuit, as some already said, is that an electromechanical "buzzer" open-circuits once every oscillation and would stop the SCR from conducting. That's why you would need a resistor across it, to maintain a conductive path. A solid state buzzer conducts continuously, so wouldn't need a parallel conductive path.

    In your simulation of my circuit, the resistor simulating the Sonalert should be in the 500 to 1K range. 100K would not allow enough current to maintain conduction in the SCR. For an electromechanical buzzer it would be in the 100 to 500Ω range. And simulated by a relay with its coil powered through its C and NC contacts. Why did you pick 1.0uF for C1 and 100K for R1? R1/C1 are only to provide a brief pulse to turn on the SCR. The values in my schematic were "bench tested" and worked. Oh, and the alarm continues until you lift your finger off the reset switch.

    There are hundreds of ways to do it with solid state circuits, but I don't think you will find one with a smaller parts-count/size than mine (actually, mvs samara's). Since your original post said "remote" you might want to add a resistor and LED across the alarm line to indicate that there still is an alarm, when the audible indicator is silenced.

    Ken
    I will redo the sonalert simulation with the values you suggest. The resistor substitution may be the reason why the circuit does not appear to be working correctly.

    I like the LED idea. Thanks.
    Last edited by ADWSystems; 30th October 2009 at 02:49 PM.

  3. #18
    ADWSystems Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    51

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KMoffett View Post
    In your simulation of my circuit, the resistor simulating the Sonalert should be in the 500 to 1K range. 100K would not allow enough current to maintain conduction in the SCR. For an electromechanical buzzer it would be in the 100 to 500Ω range. And simulated by a relay with its coil powered through its C and NC contacts. Why did you pick 1.0uF for C1 and 100K for R1? R1/C1 are only to provide a brief pulse to turn on the SCR. The values in my schematic were "bench tested" and worked. Oh, and the alarm continues until you lift your finger off the reset switch.

    Ken
    I resimulated the circuit with 1k for the buzzer instead of 100K. It works very nicely. Now to dig up an SCR.

    I choose the 1uF and 100K values because with the 100K resistor substituted for the buzzer the circuit wasn't working. I didn't know that a) the circuit was bench tested, and b) the required resistance to substitute for the sonalert; which turns out was too high to make the circuit work. In short I butchered your bench testing because my sonalert-resistor substitution was too high in the simulation.

  4. #19
    KMoffett Excellent KMoffett Excellent KMoffett Excellent KMoffett Excellent KMoffett Excellent
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis MN USA
    Posts
    1,385

    Default

    I'm old-school. I don't have simulation software, so I "usually" try to do the real thing.

    Ken
    "To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk."
    Thomas A. Edison (1847 - 1931)

  5. #20
    ADWSystems Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    51

    Default

    I don't have much of either. I was lucky that the simulation worked with less than a weeks arguing with it. There seems to be a reason why I stopped using it.

  6. #21
    mvs sarma Excellent mvs sarma Excellent mvs sarma Excellent mvs sarma Excellent mvs sarma Excellent mvs sarma Excellent mvs sarma Excellent mvs sarma Excellent mvs sarma Excellent
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Hyderabad, India.
    Posts
    2,476
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ADWSystems View Post
    I resimulated the circuit with 1k for the buzzer instead of 100K. It works very nicely. Now to dig up an SCR.

    I choose the 1uF and 100K values because with the 100K resistor substituted for the buzzer the circuit wasn't working. I didn't know that a) the circuit was bench tested, and b) the required resistance to substitute for the sonalert; which turns out was too high to make the circuit work. In short I butchered your bench testing because my sonalert-resistor substitution was too high in the simulation.
    any small SCR would do , even in a TO92 package.
    Regards,
    Sarma.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2
First 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 22
    Latest: 20th February 2010, 01:44 AM
  2. 24 second shot clock
    By mitsui58 in forum Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews
    Replies: 10
    Latest: 27th February 2008, 05:20 AM
  3. One Shot pulse
    By markn in forum General Electronics Chat
    Replies: 3
    Latest: 30th May 2005, 11:42 PM
  4. 24 Second Shot Clock
    By positive logic in forum Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews
    Replies: 2
    Latest: 27th April 2005, 04:16 PM
  5. 24 second shot clock
    By rickmel in forum Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews
    Replies: 1
    Latest: 25th February 2004, 02:53 PM

Tags for this Thread