![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews Are you building an electronic project or want to? Maybe you need some assistance? Come and submit your electronic questions here and let our experienced members find a solution. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Does anyone have a nice circuit for a discrete comparator? Something single ended, low quiescent current. Adjustable thresholds? You know, something for when it's just not worth it to use an op amp or a 339, with just a few transistors maybe?
tia, j. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Look at any electronics book or web site for a 2 transistor (bipolar, JFET or MOSFET) Schmitt trigger. Perhaps you could search the web for "Schmitt trigger".
You can design for whatever threshold levels and hystersis you want (within reason). Len |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
How about a signal conditioner that takes in a pseudo-sinusoid and outputs a square wave at the same frequency. The hysteresis function of the comparator is then used to clean up the noisy signal presumably from the tach output winding of a motor. The tachometer request pops up on this board frequently. It uses nothing more than the comparator and a few passive components.
A while back I posted a simulation of such a circuit being fed with a very noisy signal which as I recall had a couple of significant harmonics. The original plot is the last article in the thread at http://www.electro-tech-online.com/viewtopic.php?t=4569. The hysteresis is shown in the green signal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
If you want to add a few more trannies, you can improve some of the characteristics considerably - but then you might as well use an IC. In fact, the only reason I can see for using discrete parts is availablity. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
I had already seen the circuit that ljcox referred to, but it didn't have the adjustment range I wanted-- at least, I couldn't work it out to. But after doing more research it seems to have a good comparator you need a current mirror on it and that was just getting too complicated. If it could be done with a Q or 2, then ok. But I think what I'm going to do is start stocking single comparators in a SOT-23-5 package. Like the LMV331.
Thanks for the advice. j. |
|
|
|
|