![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| | |||||||
| Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews Are you building an electronic project or want to? Maybe you need some assistance? Come and submit your electronic questions here and let our experienced members find a solution. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | (permalink) |
| i don't have a frequency meter(or money to buy it) so i wonder if someone know how to build one from a multimeter (some kind of adpter).already using a software thingy but it only goes up to 22kHz and i would need something like 100khz. :wink: | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| There are frequency to voltage converter chips available. perhaps experiment with these? It won't be as accurate as the store bought meters, you have to check the chip specs. Look up google for LM 2907 or the many other listings under 'frequency to voltage converter' | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Why don't you make a prescaler (divider). For example if you use any TTL or CMOS 4-bit counter (such as 7490 or 7493 or 4017 or whatever) you can get signal divided by 10 or by 16. Then you use your multimeter to measure frequency after counter. If you use decade counter, all you have to do is shift decimal point by one place. If you use binary counter keep your calculator handy. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| I had to do something like this. why dont you use a comparator as a zero-crossing detector, a non-retriggerable multivibrator (fixed P/W) and an RC at the output. With increased frequency the duty will increase. Just need to turn the pulsewidth and teh RC to yr max freq range | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| The simplest possible device is plain decade counter. You put one of them and you have 10x range. You add one more and you have 100x range of your multimeter. Each counter san be single chip (ca $0.40 each) with no external components except maybe one capacitor from + to - and 7805 regulator in case you use TTL chips. I would suggest two counter chips (cascaded) and SPDT selector switch to choose range 10x or 100x. Someone has to show me simpler and/or cheaper circuit. | |
| |