![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| | |||||||
| Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews Are you building an electronic project or want to? Maybe you need some assistance? Come and submit your electronic questions here and let our experienced members find a solution. |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | (permalink) |
| Experienced Member | Hi Torben, Yes, good point. I have mentioned this already, my solution is simply not to refer to direction at all, simply to call it current flow. As in an earlier post, i mentioned that surprisingly there is still an element of difference of opinion over this silly issue. If pressed, then clearly the issue should be mentioned, but otherwise i have avoided scrupulously any mention of direction. The explanations fortunately dont rely on any current direction. Cheers, John
__________________ ************************************************** ***************** |
| | |
| | (permalink) |
| Experienced Member | My preference is for 'electron flow' as i suspect are most people nowadays. Hopefully it wont come up. John
__________________ ************************************************** ***************** |
| | |
| | (permalink) | |
| Experienced Member | Quote:
Yeah, hopefully the teacher doesn't ask. Last edited by Anonymous321; 7th May 2008 at 05:49 AM. | |
| | |
| | (permalink) |
| Experienced Member | Having said that, my latest entry includes current direction !! Just cant win can ya
__________________ ************************************************** ***************** |
| | |
| | (permalink) |
| Experienced Member | Anonymous, you put that like you knew all about it. . did you know of this curious issue ??
__________________ ************************************************** ***************** |
| | |
| | (permalink) |
| Experienced Member | I knew about that conventional current was from positive to negative and that electron flow was from negative to positive. But beyond that, I did not know. I did not know it was an issue either. I mean, they're two different things, right? |
| | |
| | (permalink) |
| Experienced Member | Fair enough. I tend to stick to electron flow. Just be aware, that sometimes people seem to argue for nothing.
__________________ ************************************************** ***************** |
| | |
| | (permalink) | |
| Experienced Member | Hey John, one last thing: Quote:
And if you already answered it, whoops, and sorry. | |
| | |
| | (permalink) |
| Experienced Member | my latest offering, and i wish i could set this out without arrows. but never mind. So long as you get the gist of it, i'm sure it will be fine. Unless your tutor has a background in electronics, it is unlikely he will have any particular opinion about current direction anyway. So long as what you say makes sense, i'm hoping theres no reason for direction to come up at all. Just drawn this for you ,see what you think. John
__________________ ************************************************** ***************** |
| | |
| | (permalink) |
| Experienced Member | Ah ok. Sorry! Hopefully this is the last question: so the first diagram you had--is that current circulating when the light is on the photocell? Then the second diagram's current illustrating when the light is off the photocell? |
| | |
| | (permalink) |
| Experienced Member | switching device ... Transistors which are refered to as 'switching devices' are really just normal transistors, maybe not meant to have 'good' characteristics, but still normal. Its just a term, they still turn on and off like ones that arent called switching types. ********** In this particular case, if the laser were partly obscured, like fog or smoke, or a fly in the way, then it is quite possible that the transistor could be half open, or half closed. Or in between. But not likely enough to mention, i only mention this to help you see that its just used as a current amplifier. Hope that hasn't confused you at all. I am most impressed with your level of comprehension so far. Your questions are sensible, and show some understanding of a subject which is very difficult for most people to grasp. John
__________________ ************************************************** ***************** |
| | |
| | (permalink) | ||||
| Experienced Member | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Think of it this way: the transistor is like a switch installed between the buzzer and ground. The switch is controlled by current into the base. The 47k resistor between V+ and the base can provide enough current to do this, but if the LDR between the base and ground has little enough resistance, it "robs" this current from the base of the transistor and shunts it to ground, so the transistor shuts off and the buzzer can't buzz. Hope that made some kind of sense. I'm a little tired. Torben | ||||
| | |
| | (permalink) |
| Experienced Member | Not quite ... that first one showing the split current path through the cell and the junction, was to show that the current path is made up of the two parts. The proportion of the current going through the junction, can be seen to be dependant on the state of the cell. If the cell goes higher resistance, then more goes through the junction, see what i mean ? and vice-versa, Ok John
__________________ ************************************************** ***************** |
| | |
| | (permalink) |
| Experienced Member | There ya go, Torben has described the way the cell 'bypasses' the junction, so hopefully that will be clear now. It all seems so much explaining for just a little junction ... My cat is not impressed, she's gone outside now. John
__________________ ************************************************** ***************** |
| | |
| | (permalink) |
| Experienced Member | It must be pretty late where you are. Did you put some sleeving on that transistor leg ? I think you should get to bed now. John
__________________ ************************************************** ***************** |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Latest |
| Burglar alarm school project | rpaus | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 5 | 18th January 2007 01:11 AM |
| Burglar alarm | madmikejt12 | Chit-Chat | 6 | 21st October 2006 11:40 AM |
| Adding GSM phone to burglar alarm | cctv | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 8 | 3rd October 2006 10:12 PM |
| Yet another alarm (with a laser!)... | howie69 | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 1 | 25th August 2006 11:05 PM |
| burglar alarm | chriz | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 1 | 21st June 2005 05:44 AM |