Electronic Projects, forums and more.

Go Back   Electronic Circuits Projects Diagrams Free > Electronics Forums > Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews


Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews Are you building an electronic project or want to? Maybe you need some assistance? Come and submit your electronic questions here and let our experienced members find a solution.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15th April 2008, 04:53 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Centretek
Why on earth does everyone insist in using PICs?
This is a VERY simple device, You point the trigger at the main flash and the rigger fires the slave. No more control is needed. This type of device is readily available from camera stores. The ones I originally had were about the size of a quarter roll of nickels. They had a Fresnel lens on the front and a flash socket on the back. The whole thing was mounted on a suction pad that you stuck to the slave flash body, so you could point the trigger at the main flash and the slave flash at the subject.
Crutschow's cct is exactly the thing I need, all we want now is the type numbers of the devices.
I am not everyone, crutschow posted a simple schematic that should fit your bill. Ebay have similar simple units that for less than $15.00.

But the rest of us realizes that most popular digital camera lines have inadequate flash systems. Ordinary slave units will not work with most digital cameras because these cameras use a very rapid series of pre-flashes (we're not talking about red-eye reduction). The pre-flashes are used to set the white balance of the camera's image sensor chip - not the exposure. A typical slave unit will fire on the Prue-flash it senses while the digital camera captures the image on the last flash. (Thus, the extra light from the slave does not show up in the digital camera photo.)

A few P&S (and most all other) have manual setup that allow you to defeat the preflash. But in most cases it is simpler to use a more sophisticated slave flash trigger and many have PIC's because that simplifies the design of the optical ones. Of cause there are radio ones also.
Why should these expensive systems sell if they are not needed?
Rolf is offline  
Old 15th April 2008, 04:55 PM   (permalink)
Default

I haven't found the circuit yet, and I thought the preflash was to determine the exposure. I don't know a whole lot about cameras though. My canon dslr+flash paints like a red colored hatch pattern on the target whenever you press the shutter halfway. I have no idea what that does, but it does not do any preflash.
crust is offline  
Old 15th April 2008, 04:58 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crutschow
The camera I used had the ability to turn off the pre-flash so I didn't need a counter circuit. I've had several P&S cameras where you could turn off the red-eye so I didn't relalize that was a problem.
There are some confusion here, Red Eye can be turned OFF on all P&S as far as I know. The preflash is a different story.
Rolf is offline  
Old 15th April 2008, 05:13 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crust
I haven't found the circuit yet, and I thought the preflash was to determine the exposure. I don't know a whole lot about cameras though. My canon dslr+flash paints like a red colored hatch pattern on the target whenever you press the shutter halfway. I have no idea what that does, but it does not do any preflash.
Thanks for looking.
The red colored hatch is to help the camera focus under dim light conditions.
The preflash(es) on all cameras are so fast that you can not see them. Canon have a system called TTL that communicates with their dedicated flash units. Here is what I am talking about: http://www.friedmanarchives.com/DSO_...ash_72_dpi.jpg
None of this you can see with the naked eye except the main flash.

Edit. The pre-flash is used to set the white balance before the picture is taken.

Last edited by Rolf; 15th April 2008 at 05:19 PM.
Rolf is offline  
Old 16th April 2008, 12:48 PM   (permalink)
Default

Whoa there pardner, I'm not interested in digital cameras for studio work. VERY few have sufficient resolution for SERIOUS photography. A 6X7 colour film, developed properly will allow 6ft X 7ft prints with very little loss of detail. Transparencies do even better. This is real photography, not happy snaps.
Forget the digital cameras in this case, we are back to the original request.
A cheap circuit which will reliably fire a small cheap manual electronic flash. No frills
__________________
A conclusion, is the point reached when you stop thinking.
Centretek is offline  
Old 16th April 2008, 01:55 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolf
Thanks for looking.
The red colored hatch is to help the camera focus under dim light conditions.
The preflash(es) on all cameras are so fast that you can not see them. Canon have a system called TTL that communicates with their dedicated flash units. Here is what I am talking about: http://www.friedmanarchives.com/DSO_...ash_72_dpi.jpg
None of this you can see with the naked eye except the main flash.

Edit. The pre-flash is used to set the white balance before the picture is taken.
I would guess that if you can see the 20ms main flash, the 5ms pre flash would be visable. I am taking those numbers from your scope image.

Is anyone familiar with the scan back digital cameras? They have a small ccd sensor which is mechanicly scanned accross the focal plane. Often a small 10,000 pixel sensor, can create a 50 or 60 megapixel image. This is of course at the cost of a 4-5 second exposure time. Of course with such a back, no flash would work anyhow.
Lesh is offline  
Old 16th April 2008, 02:08 PM   (permalink)
Default

ok, i found a circuit and the pdf is still online. Check out this link: http://olympus.dementia.org/hardware...ghVoltTrig.pdf.

The only difference is that a phototransistor is attached with emitter to common and collector to center pin. I am pretty sure that is it. Hopefully somebody else can chime in and confirm that the pdf is correct. Simple and powered from the flash. I was going to put it together last night, but I did not have any satisfactory SCRs in the bench stock.

Thanks for the scope trace, I had no idea the camera does that. I usually shoot in raw and adjust the white balance on the computer. That is how I did the pictures for the [plug]ps3toothfairy[/plug] device.
__________________
www.ps3toothfairy.com -- Full IR control for your PS3
crust is offline  
Old 16th April 2008, 03:00 PM   (permalink)
Default

[quote=Lesh]I would guess that if you can see the 20ms main flash, the 5ms pre flash would be visable. I am taking those numbers from your scope image.
{snip}
QUOTE]

You would be the first one. I think what is happening is that they are to closely spaced. As an example you can not distinguish the individual frames in a 16mm movie that is projected a 16 frames per second.
Rolf is offline  
Old 16th April 2008, 03:37 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Centretek
Whoa there pardner, I'm not interested in digital cameras for studio work. VERY few have sufficient resolution for SERIOUS photography. A 6X7 colour film, developed properly will allow 6ft X 7ft prints with very little loss of detail. Transparencies do even better. This is real photography, not happy snaps.
Forget the digital cameras in this case, we are back to the original request.
A cheap circuit which will reliably fire a small cheap manual electronic flash. No frills
Now that LASCR's (light activated SCR) are not available anymore, circuits have become a little more complicated. With the LASCR you needed only two components, a LASCR and a resistor. Now you need three components, a 33% increase! :-)

Seriously here is the link to the simplest unit I could find, that meets your requirements, with only three components: http://home.rochester.rr.com/carlvogt/Strobe.htm
If you don't have a suitable SCR I'll send you one to save S&H on a small order.

Last edited by Rolf; 16th April 2008 at 03:39 PM.
Rolf is offline  
Old 16th April 2008, 03:48 PM   (permalink)
Default

[quote=Rolf]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lesh
I would guess that if you can see the 20ms main flash, the 5ms pre flash would be visable. I am taking those numbers from your scope image.
{snip}
QUOTE]

You would be the first one. I think what is happening is that they are to closely spaced. As an example you can not distinguish the individual frames in a 16mm movie that is projected a 16 frames per second.
The spacing is 140 ms (1/7 second). I hadn't given thought to the spacing between the flashes. Given the spacing between the flashes, I would guess that you could discern a difference between a signle flash, and the preflash / flash, although it would not appear to be a second flash.

You did say that "The preflash(es) on all cameras are so fast that you can not see them." I disagree, I am sure I could see a 5ms flash.
Lesh is offline  
Old 16th April 2008, 04:23 PM   (permalink)
Default

[quote=Lesh]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolf
{snip}
You did say that "The preflash(es) on all cameras are so fast that you can not see them." I disagree, I am sure I could see a 5ms flash.
Of cause you can see a single 5ms flash.
I did not state that very clearly. I meant to say that the eye cant perceive the two flashes as more than one, because they occur to closely.
Rolf is offline  
Old 16th April 2008, 04:43 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolf
Seriously here is the link to the simplest unit I could find, that meets your requirements, with only three components: http://home.rochester.rr.com/carlvogt/Strobe.htm
If you don't have a suitable SCR I'll send you one to save S&H on a small order.
I looked at that circuit, and while it might work correctly with some flashes the problem is that many modern flashes have a continuous current between the trigger and the common. If this current stays above the SCR continous on current, then this circuit won't reset. But you could always try it and if it has trouble, add the diode, phototransistor, and try again.
__________________
www.ps3toothfairy.com -- Full IR control for your PS3
crust is offline  
Old 16th April 2008, 05:01 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crust
I looked at that circuit, and while it might work correctly with some flashes the problem is that many modern flashes have a continuous current between the trigger and the common. If this current stays above the SCR continous on current, then this circuit won't reset. But you could always try it and if it has trouble, add the diode, phototransistor, and try again.
I know what you are referring to, the Canon EX are an example of flashes that doesn't do well with SCR triggers.
I have successfully used HV transistors to trigger these EX units but then the trigger doesn't reliably trigger all models of the more common Vivitar's.
So it seems like you have a compatibility problem no matter what you do, at least I have not come up with a universal solution.
I don't have a EX to test but I would like to know if a resistor in series with the SCR could help. My three different model Vivitars will trigger when shorted with a 25k resistor.

Last edited by Rolf; 16th April 2008 at 05:17 PM.
Rolf is offline  
Old 16th April 2008, 05:50 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolf
I know what you are referring to, the Canon EX are an example of flashes that doesn't do well with SCR triggers.
I have successfully used HV transistors to trigger these EX units but then the trigger doesn't reliably trigger all models of the more common Vivitar's.
So it seems like you have a compatibility problem no matter what you do, at least I have not come up with a universal solution.
I don't have a EX to test but I would like to know if a resistor in series with the SCR could help. My three different model Vivitars will trigger when shorted with a 25k resistor.

I've got an EX, but I don't use it as a slave. I guess I could use the internal flash to trigger it if I build the circuit. The flash I used is some cheap thing that came in two pieces. It had a flash body and then an add-on to make it work with a minolta.
__________________
www.ps3toothfairy.com -- Full IR control for your PS3
crust is offline  
Old 16th April 2008, 11:18 PM   (permalink)
Default

Here's a homebrew slave trigger that I used for several years. Similar to the one crutschaw posted. The standby current draw was about 0.5ľA...I never had to replace the batteries. Because of the choke in the base-emitter circuit it was immune to ambient light levels. I suppose you might replace battery with his(?) resistive-divider/capacitor power supply. I had experimented with a L14F2 photo darlington, with better sensitivity...but never went ahead and changed it.

Ken
Attached Images
File Type: gif SlaveFlashTrigger.gif (4.3 KB, 9 views)
__________________
"To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk."
Thomas A. Edison (1847 - 1931)
KMoffett is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Similar Threads
Title Starter Forum Replies Latest
Master and Slave LCD sim? RobertS Micro Controllers 5 6th January 2008 03:09 AM
Slave I2C YAN-1 Micro Controllers 0 15th September 2007 07:46 PM
Slave I2C, 16F88 Fred.Amoson Micro Controllers 13 21st July 2007 04:27 AM
uC 'network' reset circuitry rockin_rick Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews 8 30th May 2006 02:03 AM
I2C mssp help with master to slave comm PicChristmas Micro Controllers 1 16th July 2005 06:32 AM



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:34 AM.


Electronic Circuits  |  Learning Electronics
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

eXTReMe Tracker