Hi All
I want a circuit for emergency Light.
Did some one help me to chose a better circuit for long
lighting time.
Which one is Better Circuit#1 Or Circuit#2

I also need a circuit for fast battery (6v 4.5Ah)charging
How can i use max712 for this purpose.

Attached Images

	Circuit1.GIF (4.8 KB, 55 views)
	Circuit2.GIF (3.5 KB, 39 views)

 

Circuit one is the best, it powes the tube of AC rather than pulsed DC.

Look at the datasheet for the MAX712.

Also note that if you're using a lead acid batter yyou don't need a fancy IC like to charge it, a constant voltage power supply will do.

__________________
I also post at the following sites:
http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com
Screen name: Aloone_Jonez
And http://www.silicontronics.com, same screen name as here.

 

Also D882 is getting hot too much. So it needs an adequate heat sink.

Instead of 2 Feet fluorescent tube you can couple two 7W small fluorescent tubes to get a sharp brightness also considering power consumption.

__________________
Gayan

My Website
http://gsmicro.blogspot.com/

 

Thanks Buddy

I am using 6.6 V D.C supply circuit for Charging It charge battery too slow nearly (Minimum.3 hours). I want a fast charger that can charge the battery in maximum 1 Hour. Do you have any other Circuit?

 

I second what Gayan Soyza says about using 7W tubes.

Also note that getting good performance from these simple circuits can be a challenge, you might need to play with the resistor values a bit to optimise it.

Charging at 7V will charge the battery faster (6.6V won't charge it fully) but why do you want a fast charger with an emergancy light? Normally you leave the thing pluged in continously so you don't need a fast charger.

__________________
I also post at the following sites:
http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com
Screen name: Aloone_Jonez
And http://www.silicontronics.com, same screen name as here.

 

No one asked what type of battery do you use.

For lead acid batteries the low current charge voltage would be 6.8V and you can leave it connected forever, the fast charge voltage would be 7.2V but after a full charge you should switch it to lower voltage.

About these designs, I would go for a simpler one or probably make both and see which is more efficient e.g. which would heat less air and give more light.

Also, the second design also gives AC at the secondary.

Good luck,

 

The second design does not give true AC at the secondary, it gives a stream of negitive pulses. If the tube is powered from it for too long only one of the cathodes will turn black dramatically shortening the life of the tube.

I assume he's using a lead acid battery.

The best option for a fast charge would be a microcontrolled charger and there are plenty of circuits around on the Internet for that.

__________________
I also post at the following sites:
http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com
Screen name: Aloone_Jonez
And http://www.silicontronics.com, same screen name as here.

 

so would this happen to be like one of those exit signs they put above doors? As far as i know those things are plugged in all the time. I found one of those down at the dump, I took it home, opened it up and found a nice little 3 volt rechargeable battery. There was only one tube inside it, and a little inverter circuit to power it.

__________________
The 3 laws of science....
1. If it smells bad, It's chemistry.
2. If it's mushy, It's biology.
3. If it doesn't work, It's physics.
www.laserpointerforums.com A forum for disscusion of lasers and laser shows!
www.laserchat.org IRC chat for laser and electronic related stuff.

 

Emergency circuits means in sudden situations like power failure's the circuit must react.

I have seen most SLA charger circuits in emergency lights they use overnight charging methods.They have adjusted the charging voltage to 6.8V-6.9V standby voltage as in the battery specifications.

__________________
Gayan

My Website
http://gsmicro.blogspot.com/

 

Sorry, I do not mean to start anything bad here but...

In both designs the uotput current is going to be AC.
Absolutely.

Maybe not the best shape though, but that has to do with an oscillator circuit.

Cheers.

 

I think we might be getting in to the pulsed DC vs AC debate again.

Alright I'll avoid that one for now.

If you drive a transformer with a single transistor then you'll get pulses of current as the field collapses around the coil; these pulses will always be in the same direction.

The circuit with two transistors is a push pull blocking oscillator; the transistors turn on alternately and the coils are wound out of phase so the field alternates therefore the current in the secondary alternates between positive and negitive.

Of course you can make the first circuit produce true AC by adding a DC blocking capacitor in series with the load but it still won't be as good.

A good analogy is a complementary pair driving a load vs an h-bridge; the complementary pair won't give a true AC waveform without a DC blocking capacitor and the h-bridge will.

__________________
I also post at the following sites:
http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com
Screen name: Aloone_Jonez
And http://www.silicontronics.com, same screen name as here.

 

You've got me confused. Both circuits have transformer-coupled outputs, so no DC can flow unless the load is nonlinear. Furthermore, the 1st circuit does have a blocking capacitor in series with the load. Perhaps you meant to say "you can make the second circuit produce true AC by adding a DC blocking capacitor in series with the load". As I think you were implying, the 2nd circuit probably produces AC with a non-50% duty cycle.
A complementary driver can produce true AC if the load is returned to GND, while the driver swings plus/minus.

__________________
Ron

 

Guys,

When I went to university, the EMF in secondary winding (let's make it simpler -Voltage) depended not on absolute magnetic flux but the change in that flux in time. So any DC component in the primary just won't go through the transformer, then you can say that those windings are galvanically isolated. That is actually the second use of a transformer.
Any DC component in the primary wind. will just heat it up, and reduce power handling capacity of the core, which makes a capacitor a good idea. You just need to tune it well to avoid too much oscillation.
This ground connection at the sec. side is there just to prevent voltage buildup due to various parasitic effects, pesonally I'd put a 1K-10K resistor there since actually no current will flow there if the system is built well, and it can preven too quick a discharge while pluging/unpluging the device.

But, again, might be, laws of physics did change, I didn't check lately. :P

 

I didn't say that DC is being transferred from the primary to the secondary side of the transformer.

I just said that without a capacitor in series with the tube circuit 2 will produce negitive pulses rather than both positive and negitive pulses therefore more electrons will be boiled of the negitive cathode of the tube causing it to go black and prematurely fail.

Circuit 1 does have a capacitor in series with the coil and this is to limit the current to the required level and is another reason why it is better than circuit 2.

Here's where I got my information from.
http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/samschem.htm#schlpfi

Although I would agree the author's terminology isn't totally correct, what he says is perfectly valid. I've powered a fluroscent tube of one of these cheap circuits and one end of the tube got dark causing it to fail prematurely.

__________________
I also post at the following sites:
http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com
Screen name: Aloone_Jonez
And http://www.silicontronics.com, same screen name as here.

 

Ok, now,

I see why the first design tends to perform better. I'd still check it. Now believe me even if you feed the primary with AC+DC, the only current that you can get on the secondary will be AC, regardless if you drive the core to saturation or not. Of course if you do you'll have some losses there.
Let's see.
As primary gets series of pulses, the core's flux goes from 0 to maximum flux, (not - to + max-flux as if you'd power it with AC, drawback: you can use only half the transfer energy capacity of the core but that's not the issue here) As the flux rises you'll get the EMF in one direction, as it falls to zero, you'll get the emf in other direction. NO DC COMPOUND!
The most probable reasons for blackening one side of the tube (thus emmiting mass of one heater/electrode) would be:
-unbalanced duty factor, The duration of pulse should be as much as just to drive the core to saturation or even better, just not to. Duration of off period should be the same (as to allow the core to recover to zero). This can take some fiddly tuning and adjusting.
-the second reason would be very different rise and fall times of those pulses hence one electrode would handle higher current, the shorter time and vice versa. That can pretty much evaporate the electrode during time.
Otherwise, it should just work fine.
The first design makes beter use of transformer, hence the smaller is needed, but not really a standard one, and is easier to tune. The second uses one transistor, and a bigger transformer, but can be one off a shelf, and is a bit more fiddly to tune. Choose for yourself.
Personally, I would get a Chinese one for almost nothing and probably wouldn't bother too much if not going for a production of it.