![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews Are you building an electronic project or want to? Maybe you need some assistance? Come and submit your electronic questions here and let our experienced members find a solution. |
![]() |
| | Tools |
| | #76 |
|
Flux is usually applied to the joint to be formed just before heat is applied. The only reason nigel recommends liquid flux is because the flux will wick via capilary action inbetween the leads all by itself where paste flux will just kind of glob in bad places unless you're careful with it. Mind you there is always a flux residue afterwards that needs to be dealt with, sometimes acidic and VERY bad if left in place.
__________________ "Because I be what I be. I would tell you what you want to know if I could, mum, but I be a cat, and no cat anywhere ever gave anyone a straight answer, har har." | |
| |
| | #77 |
|
How should I apply to the joint? By using cotton tips?? Thanks
__________________ bananasiong | |
| |
| | #78 |
|
With the little brush that comes in the top of the bottle - rather like a nail varnish bottle (if you do your nails?).
| |
| |
| | #79 |
|
You only need enough to 'wet' the surface, whatever method you chose to apply it is your own buisness. Cotton would be a HORRIBLE idea. I've tried to clean leads with cotton swabs before, and they always catch the threads and tear it to shreds right on the board leaving cotton mess behind. If it doesn't come with a brush like Nigel says use a generic nylon paintbrush from a hobby store.
__________________ "Because I be what I be. I would tell you what you want to know if I could, mum, but I be a cat, and no cat anywhere ever gave anyone a straight answer, har har." | |
| |
| | #80 |
| Don't use plumber's flux that has acid in it. I haven't used liquid or paste electronic flux for about 40 years. Instead I have been using solder with electronic flux as its core. I never had to clean a pcb, I just solder and it works. My soldering iron is temperature-controlled so it never gets too hot and never burns the flux like cheap soldering irons. Maybe you are using the horrible new solder without lead in it. I haven't tried it but others say it sticks poorly.
__________________ Uncle $crooge | |
| |
| | #81 | |
| Quote:
| ||
| |
| | #82 | |
| Quote:
I had some defective MP3 players that were "unrepairable" by a store. I removed a few good parts from one and swapped the bad parts in another and got one working perfectly. The parts were all tiny surface-mount things but I removed and replaced them without using extra flux.
__________________ Uncle $crooge | ||
| |
| | #83 |
|
You can be sure of one thing auidoguru... =) The joints would be stronger with flux.
__________________ "Because I be what I be. I would tell you what you want to know if I could, mum, but I be a cat, and no cat anywhere ever gave anyone a straight answer, har har." | |
| |
| | #84 |
|
14 pin ones are hardly anything difficult ![]() My usual ones to change are 80 pin, and fairly small spaced - liquid flux is pretty well essential - although an alternative method is to use solder paste. | |
| |
| | #85 | ||
| Quote:
Quote:
__________________ I do not answer private messages asking for help because no one else can: benefit from advice I may give or correct me if I'm wrong. Please ask on the open forum if you have a question and I'll be happy to help, if I know the answer. | |||
| |
| | #86 |
|
While waiting for the smt parts, I tired to modify the 'crappy' rf module. I'm using a CMOS NAND gate for the transmitter, when I pull up one input of the NAND gate with a 10 k hm:, it doesn't oscillate as expected. So I turn the transmitter on and off using a transistor by PIC. It works at the bit rate of 10 ms. I'm still learning the method of coding and decoding, this is what I can do so far.I wonder why I can't modulate from the logic gate.. Thanks
__________________ bananasiong | |
| |
| | #87 |
|
Do the Cmos gated oscillator like this:
__________________ Uncle $crooge | |
| |
| | #88 |
|
Any NPN transistor will do right? I'll use 2N3904 for this. If I do it this way, can the bit rate be faster? But I don't know whether the poor receiver can receive as fast as the transmitter do or not. Thanks
__________________ bananasiong | |
| |
| | #89 |
|
I think the LM567 in the receiver is slow. Its max switching speed is f0/20. f0 is about 7kHz so the switching speed is 350Hz.
__________________ Uncle $crooge | |
| |
| | #90 |
|
So the fastest switching time is 2.85 ms per bit right?
__________________ bananasiong | |
| |
|
| Tags |
| 300mhz, module |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar | ||||
| Title | Starter | Forum | Replies | Latest |
| Chip talk | dreamproject | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 8 | 2nd April 2005 08:24 PM |
| Motor control interface | dreamproject | Micro Controllers | 0 | 31st March 2005 04:48 AM |
| controlling laser module via RF receiver | mr. mister | Robotics Chat | 1 | 28th February 2005 04:45 PM |
| ignition module | induction1 | General Electronics Chat | 5 | 25th November 2003 12:35 AM |
| Safety interlock module | wilfredmike | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 6 | 2nd November 2003 09:41 PM |