+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 Last
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: TV Jammer Circuit?

  1. #1
    eric55441 Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15

    Default TV Jammer Circuit?

    I found this and am wondering if it would work to jam a tv's reception. Its an ascii circuit diagram so it has to be viewed with a fixed width font.
    Attached Files


  2. #2
    Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Michigan, USA (GMT-5)
    Posts
    2,892

    Default

    Only a lowlife would jam TV reception. It is clearly illegal. If you do it for real, I hope they catch you and subject to severe criminal and civil penalties.

  3. #3
    eric55441 Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15

    Default

    well i dont think it weould affect anything except the tv in the room your in. its just a prank.

  4. #4
    HarveyH42 Excellent HarveyH42 Excellent HarveyH42 Excellent HarveyH42 Excellent HarveyH42 Excellent HarveyH42 Excellent HarveyH42 Excellent
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,081

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Papabravo
    Only a lowlife would jam TV reception. It is clearly illegal. If you do it for real, I hope they catch you and subject to severe criminal and civil penalties.
    That's a good one... Back in high school (25 or so years ago...), the basic TV jammer was a popular project. We spent a lot of time trying to make the smallest PCB. The output was well within legal limits, basically same room. Since cable and satelite TV pretty much dominates most households (not mine), doubt many people build these things anymore.

    I think this circuit is garbage. Uses a 7404 off a 9 volt battery. There is no inductor, no antenna.

  5. #5
    Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Michigan, USA (GMT-5)
    Posts
    2,892

    Default

    If you don't know what it would or would not affect, why give it a second thought. If your intent is to cause distress to a nearby TV watcher, then it does not matter what power level you are using or how effective the device is. It is still wrong. Even if you don't get caught, you can be certain of my opinion of your actions. Just so we are clear.

  6. #6
    eric55441 Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Do you know a better way to make one?

  7. #7
    Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent Papabravo Excellent
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Michigan, USA (GMT-5)
    Posts
    2,892

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HarveyH42
    That's a good one... Back in high school (25 or so years ago...), the basic TV jammer was a popular project. We spent a lot of time trying to make the smallest PCB. The output was well within legal limits, basically same room. Since cable and satelite TV pretty much dominates most households (not mine), doubt many people build these things anymore.

    I think this circuit is garbage. Uses a 7404 off a 9 volt battery. There is no inductor, no antenna.
    Exactly which legal limits are you talking about for the creation of harmful interference, to use the FCC's term. How would you feel if your little prank stopped a pacemaker, or interfered with a public safety response. Little pranks often have unintended consequences. Think about it. Find another outlet for your energy and creativity.

  8. #8
    eric55441 Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Papabravo
    Exactly which legal limits are you talking about for the creation of harmful interference, to use the FCC's term. How would you feel if your little prank stopped a pacemaker, or interfered with a public safety response. Little pranks often have unintended consequences. Think about it. Find another outlet for your energy and creativity.
    I will try not to kill anyone with my 9v battery and 7404 chip.

  9. #9
    dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    6,028

    Default

    Just like how I try not to kill someone when I choose to drive drunk. What you think it might do is irrelevent to what it will actually do.

  10. #10
    eric55441 Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dknguyen
    Just like how I try not to kill someone when I choose to drive drunk. What you think it might do is irrelevent to what it will actually do.
    Well I suppose it is lucky I have been sober for 15 years and have never made a TV jammer.

  11. #11
    dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent dknguyen Excellent
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    6,028

    Default

    Yes it is, so why smear a spotless record?

  12. #12
    audioguru Excellent audioguru Excellent audioguru Excellent audioguru Excellent audioguru Excellent audioguru Excellent audioguru Excellent audioguru Excellent audioguru Excellent audioguru Excellent
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada, of course!
    Posts
    19,859

    Default

    A TV's picture is transmitted in lousy AM so interference from a jammer is visible much farther than you want.
    Make or buy an IR remote control to turn off the TV's power instead.
    Uncle $crooge

  13. #13
    HarveyH42 Excellent HarveyH42 Excellent HarveyH42 Excellent HarveyH42 Excellent HarveyH42 Excellent HarveyH42 Excellent HarveyH42 Excellent
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,081

    Default

    The trasmitter's output was below 1/10th watt. So, pacemakers are that sensitive to low power transmitters? Must be hell for you around all those cell phone users in public.

    My high school electronics teach was ex-navy (career man), very by the rules, strict as hell on safety issues in his shop. I doubt very seriously he would have allowed anything remotely dangerous or illegal.

    The same circuit is availiable as a kit, from many online sourses, which would lend me to believe its legal and safe to use.

    Back to the origional post...
    Don't think it could work. 7404 is TTL, wouldn't 9 volts kill it? I'm guess it's wired as an oscillator, but seems like its a little light on parts. Every transmitter circuit I've seen (not a field of huge interest to me), has an inductor, usually a small hand-wound coil, just a few turns.

    I don't know about pacemakers, but I can't imagine they are so sensitive to interference. There is a lot of strong electro-magnetic energy about, much more common and powerful than what could be produced by a 9 volt battery.
    Must be a huge 'avoid a all cost...' list for pacemaker recipients, not to mention all the exercise, diet, and lifestyle do's and don'ts. Trying to avoid everything bad, and remembering to follow all those recomondations, remebering which medication at which time, with/without food... Wouldn't all that stress kill you anyway?

  14. #14
    eric55441 Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Here is a similar design. Does use an antenna in this one. It says that even though the chip is meant to operate on 5v it will work with 9v but get a little hot.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by eric55441; 28th June 2006 at 04:25 AM.

  15. #15
    Paul Obrien
    Guest

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 Last

Tags for this Thread