![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| | |||||||
| Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews Are you building an electronic project or want to? Maybe you need some assistance? Come and submit your electronic questions here and let our experienced members find a solution. |
| | LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | (permalink) | |||
| Quote:
Yes, the output of the comparator goes low when its inverting input has a higher voltage than its non-inverting input. Quote:
Quote:
__________________ Uncle $crooge | ||||
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
*what's the value of the coil which is without a shield? it can be any value? i don't know about that, i have just seen them before. what's the different between with shield and without shield? | ||
| |
| | (permalink) |
| The inductor has many turns of wire. The receiver's inductor won't pickup much magnetic signal if it has a shield. An aluminum or plastic cover won't block the magnetic signal but a steel one will. Did you tune the frequency of the transmitter to be at the peak frequency of the receiver's tuned circuit?
__________________ Uncle $crooge | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| yes. both tx and rx frequency also almost 10kHz. i think the 10mH inductor which i'm using is a ceramic type, it looks like a big big resistor with brown color. i just want to know whether there is any other way or not to increase the sensitivity and which part of the receiver is the most sensitive to the signal. does this type of coil have any value? ![]() Last edited by bananasiong; 26th May 2006 at 06:55 PM. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| You need to change the frequency of the transmitter and monitor the receiver for its highest sensitivity to a frequency. It might peak at 9600Hz but not be very sensitive at 10kHz. The big inductor in the picture has only a few turns and doesn't have an iron or ferrite core, so its value is measured in uH. On the web are instructions for making them. The inductor in the receiver's circuit is the most sensitive part for the signal. I don't remember if it is the most sensitive when it is vertical or horizontal when compared to the transmitter's loop that is flat on the floor.
__________________ Uncle $crooge | |
| |
| | (permalink) | |||
| Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
__________________ Uncle $crooge | ||
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
How if i use 100mH and 2.2nF? The rx frequency now is 10730Hz. And the 555 tx frequency is determined by R1=3.3K, R2=5.6K, C=0.01uF which is 9949Hz. Which one is better?? | ||
| |
| | (permalink) |
| You don't theoretically calculate the values (except roughly). The coil is fixed, and you have a fixed capacitor across it, however, it's VERY easy to adjust the 555 frequency, and you should have a preset resistor in circuit for that very purpose. Adjust the frequency of the 555 to give the maximum range - if you have a scope you can adjust it for maximum voltage across the tuned circuit. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Calculation the value of parts is only approximate since they have a tolerance. Then you need to TUNE the frequency of the transmitter to A PEAK in the response of the receiver. If you don't then the circuits won't be matched and will have poor sensitivity.
__________________ Uncle $crooge | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| oookay.. i didn't do that because of the VR canot fixed well on the breadboard, besides that it is also big and heavy. but now i think i have to do that to get the maximum range *once i get the max range, can i use a normal resistor to replace the VR which is same value as the tuned VR?? thanks for helping ^_^V | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| VR= Variable Resistor? Don't use a big and heavy volume control, instead use a small and lightweight trimmer potentiometer. They are turned with a small screwdriver.
__________________ Uncle $crooge | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| hey... thanks for your helping... i get the best range i want just by changing the inductor to the larger value. Thank you so much | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| 555: 1. I thought i only need to calculate the charging and discharging time by using RC time constant, why should i include the ln2? 393: 1. For the normal comparator, when input to +ve is larger then -ve, the output is the different between them or what? How if when -ve larger than +ve? 2. The internal transistor in LM393 is npn or pnp type? Does it need 0.7V to turn the transistor on? 3. Instead of using 100K, can i use other value (i think larger value) to increase the input offset voltage so that the output will only go low when larger voltage go into the -ve. This is because i don't want it to be affected by other sourse. Thanks a lot Last edited by bananasiong; 30th May 2006 at 05:16 PM. | |
| |
| | (permalink) | ||||
| Quote:
Quote:
If +in is more positive than -in then the output is high. If -in is more positive than +in then the output is low. Quote:
Quote:
__________________ Uncle $crooge Last edited by audioguru; 30th May 2006 at 05:35 PM. | |||||
| |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.electro-tech-online.com/electronic-projects-design-ideas-reviews/21585-my-explaination.html | ||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Positioning systems? - Hobby, Science, Consumer Robots From Around the World | This thread | Refback | 21st May 2008 06:24 PM | |