![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| | |||||||
| Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews Are you building an electronic project or want to? Maybe you need some assistance? Come and submit your electronic questions here and let our experienced members find a solution. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | (permalink) |
| Does anyone have the model library that contains variable voltage regulators such as the LM317? Also, how should I model a Brushless motor in this type of simulator. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| You should learn how to make your own models. Find the equivalent circuit in the data sheet and build it in the simulator. Your simulator should have a process for converting it to a subcircuit. You have to know how the brushless motor works in order to make a model, I can't help you there.
__________________ see my website: www.geocities.com/russlk | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Thanks for the quick primer. The free version of this software has a limited number of nodes it will simulate before it asks you for some money. What do you mean by the data sheet. Do you have the URL that shows me the inner workings (or one possible implementation) of the LM317? | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| I found this: http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/LM317-D.PDF This would take me hours construct when I'm pretty sure there are text files that approximate the behavior of this circuit and will work in the free version of this software. Am I wrong to think this? | |
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
* Voltage regulator TI transistor level model * .SUBCKT LM317/TI in adj out * PEI 08/98 p62 J1 in out 4 JN Q2 5 5 6 QPL .1 Q3 5 8 9 QNL .2 Q4 8 5 7 QPL .1 Q5 81 8 out QNL .2 Q6 out 81 10 QPL .2 Q7 12 81 13 QNL .2 *Q8 10 5 11 QPL .2 Q8 10A 5 11 QPL .2 Q9 14 12 10 QPL .2 Q10 16 5 17 QPL .2 Q11 16 14 15 QNL .2 OFF Q12 out 20 16 QPL .2 Q13 in 19 20 QNL .2 Q14 19 5 18 QPL .2 Q15 out 21 19 QPL .2 Q16 21 22 16 QPL .2 Q17 21 out 24 QNL .2 Q18 22 22 16 QPL .2 Q19 22 out 241 QNL .2 Q20 out 25 16 QPL .2 Q21 25 26 out QNL .2 Q22A 35 35 in QPL .2 Q22B 16 35 in QPL .2 Q23 35 16 30 QNL .2 Q24A 27 40 29 QNL .2 Q24B 27 40 28 QNL .2 Q25 in 31 41 QNL 5 Q26 in 41 32 QNL 50 D1 out 4 DZ D2 33 in DZ D3 29 34 DZ R1 in 6 310 R2 in 7 310 R3 in 11 190 R4 in 17 82 R5 in 18 5.6K R6 4 8 100K R7 8 81 130 *R8 10 12 12.4K R8 10A 12 12.4K R9 9 out 180 R10 13 out 4.1K R11 14 out 5.8K R12 15 out 72 R13 20 out 5.1K R14 adj 24 12K R15 24 241 2.4K R16 16 25 6.7K R17 16 40 12K R18 30 41 130 R19 16 31 370 R20 26 27 13K R21 27 40 400 R22 out 41 160 R23 33 34 18K R24 28 29 160 R25 28 32 3 R26 32 out .1 C1 21 out 30PF C2 21 adj 30PF C3 25 26 5PF CBS1 5 out 2PF CBS2 35 out 1PF CBS3 22 out 1PF .MODEL JN NJF (BETA=1E-4 VTO=-7) .MODEL DZ D(BV=6.3) .MODEL QNL NPN (EG=1.22 BF=80 RB=100 CCS=1.5PF TF=.3NS TR=6NS + CJE=2PF CJC=1PF VAF=100 IS=1E-22 NF=1.2) .MODEL QPL PNP (BF=40 RB=20 TF=.6NS TR=10NS CJE=1.5PF CJC=1PF VAF=50 + IS=1E-22 NF=1.2) .ENDS LM317/TI | ||
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Here is a behavioral model of the same thing. * Voltage regulator behavioral model * .SUBCKT LM317/B IN ADJ OUT * * POSITIVE ADJUSTABLE VOLTAGE REGULATOR BEHAVIORAL MODEL * JADJ IN ADJ ADJ JADJMOD ;ADJUSTMENT PIN CURRENT VREF 4 ADJ 1.250 DBK IN 13 DMOD CBC 13 15 800.0E-12 RBC 15 5 1.000E3 QPASS 13 5 OUT QPASSMOD RB1 7 6 1 RB2 6 5 128.3 DSC 6 11 DMOD ESC 11 OUT VALUE={5.646-.6667*V(6,5)*V(13,5)} DFB 6 12 DMOD EFB 12 OUT VALUE={8.822-.4024*V(13,5)+5.250E-3*V(13,5)*V(13,5) + -.6667*V(13,5)*V(6,5)} * EB 7 OUT 8 OUT 6.939 RP 9 8 100 CPZ 10 OUT 3.183E-6 * DPU 10 OUT DMOD ;POWER-UP CLAMPLING DIODE RZ 8 10 .1 EP 9 OUT 4 OUT 100 RI OUT 4 100MEG * .MODEL QPASSMOD NPN (IS=30F BF=50 VAF=1.500 NF=1.701) .MODEL JADJMOD NJF (BETA=50.00E-6 VTO=-1) .MODEL DMOD D (IS=30F N=1.701) .ENDS | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Unless the LM317 is a significant part of your circuit, it is a waste of time to simulate it. I would use a voltage source, perhaps with an output resistor to simulate the output resistance of the LM317. If the LM317 is interacting with your circuit, you should consider re-design.
__________________ see my website: www.geocities.com/russlk | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Thanks, but the purpose of the circuit is to control the 317 so that it produces between 6 and 10 volts at its output. In other words, it isn't hard-wired to produce X volts. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| OK, so simulation makes sense, but if it were me, I would read the data sheet and design to accomodate the worst case. It is likely that the model for simulation is not worse case, so the results will be typical and not represent what will happen in production.
__________________ see my website: www.geocities.com/russlk | |
| |