![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews Are you building an electronic project or want to? Maybe you need some assistance? Come and submit your electronic questions here and let our experienced members find a solution. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
(permalink) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Hi Cyberquest,
I think I replied on another web-forum. Your transmitter doesn't give the max allowed power probably because it gives the max allowed harmonics that cause interference on other frequencies. My son's RC car looked like yours but was bigger and was powered by a 7.2V big rechargeable battery. It went very fast and had a range of at least 400 feet. Its good range was probably because its receiver was very sensitive. It could pickup transmitters a few blocks away! Whenever my son stopped it, it would start running around by itself! If you boost the power of your transmitter, you might be controlling RC toys all over town, causing radio and TV interference and asking for a visit from the RF cops.
__________________
Uncle $crooge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Be careful!
There are frequencies that other people use around you. If you are able to jam those frequencies, then expect some trouble. I got caught a few times by my mom for screwing her T.V. up when I wasn't intending on transmitting on that frequency, and the transmitter was powered with a 9V battery. Your best bet is to get frequency information first. If the frequency is way up there in gigahertz where almost nobody goes, then you probably will be OK at transmitting at 1000 feet. I would suggest getting yourself licensed. Even ham operators can't transmit on certain frequencies without a license. and for the frequency, use the equation: 1 /(2 * pi * sqr(L * C)) sqr = square root of, L = inductor, C = capacitor, pi = your PIE button on your calculator. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Hi again I understand what you're saying . BUT. I Check with my local FCC AGENCY. THEY TOLD ME any RF transmitters that is 100mW power output and under is find in my frequency band and does not have to be licensed. Plus these cars work at FT-bands that are licensed through the company who apply through the FCC for that band for the public to use these cars on. And 1000ft is within and under the range the FCC STATES IN fcc part-15 by law. Thats in the states where I'm locate. maybe the laws are different in your country. Or are you from the states. 100mW HAS a range just under 1300FT, thats stated by fcc part-15reg by law.Now as for CB thats a whole other avenue. They transmitter on AM and i think FM WITH output powers in WATTS. ANYWHERE FROM 3TO400 WATTS OR MORE. THIS IS WHAT I been told through the FCC. That WHY YOU need a licensed for CBs. not for a R/C TOY CAR. THERES always going to be some interferance with some frequencies on these small bands but that does not mean i need a licensed for a R/C CAR. GO IN TO RADIO SHACK AND ASK IF YOU NEED A LICENSED FOR A R/C CAR AND THERE ANSWER I BET YOU THEY WILL SAY NO. AS for the last part of your answer can you give me an example! please explain. this is what i need for you to be more elaborent on. I thank you for your time and your help. JJ 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
I think that your toy car is too cheap to have more range. Maybe its transmitter isn't correctly tuned. Maybe its receiver isn't correctly tuned and doesn't have enough gain. Maybe the factory had to reduce the gain of the receiver so that it doesn't overload when close to the transmitter.
__________________
Uncle $crooge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Your answer is really pretty simple! - buy a 'proper' radio control system for a model car, instead of the 'toy' you currently have.
You're not likely to find any suitable DIY designs, nor are you likely to be capable of building and aligning one (if you could, you wouldn't need to be asking here!). The reason for the lack of DIY is that it's so cheap to buy them, why pay many times the cost for an inferior DIY system?, when a commercial one is so cheaply available - plus the encoder/decoder chips aren't usually available to individuals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Wait a minute, Cyberquest!
The transmitter was fully assembled by the factory so its details are not shown. It uses a cheap encoder IC that operates on only 3V. Q1, the 27MHz oscillator and Q2, the RF power output stage operate from 9V to get max output. But C6 is in a capacitive voltage divider with C5, and they are required to attenuate the output of the oscillator so that the IC's output isn't damaged by overvoltage. Therefore Q2 doesn't have enough drive to give much output. Also, the schematic doesn't show a capacitor across L2 to tune it to 27MHz and therefore the output is reduced further. You could try reducing the value of R6 in the transmitter to get more output. However it might only reduce the life of the battery. There isn't much you can do to the receiver since it is built into an IC. I am sorry that you have a cheap toy with only a 40 foot range. :cry:
__________________
Uncle $crooge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
to audioguru: I understand that the encoder operates on 3V. because it has a operating range of 2.2 to 5V . It uses a zener diode to regulate the 3V from the 9V power supply. the oscillator is set for the carrier band-wd of 29.9mhz but has a range of 27.0-27.9. do to the fact that the first xtal in the transmitter and not in the car. is basically solved by the wide open receiver designed. it will accept a singal around 27.9mhz ( if the car is tuned for 27) its not a specific tuned for a specific frequency. there is no xtal in the car just a crude receiver that takes in random noise from the antenna and filters out all frequency and lets throught the 27-27.9 range do to this open reciver design. if what you sad is ture in you answer. then i think mybe not to change any of the original design just add a third stage another power amplifier transistor to increase to 100mW with out over loading the power supply. 9V can handle 100mV and another stage.Can this be done. if not. explain why!. or can you gave me a circuit that would work for R/C cars. 100mW is the maximum power output that can be usedand i need. can you help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
cyberquest, I think you have just provided the answers to your problem, the quote you:
"wide open receiver", "crude receiver" and to be perfectly honest, the transmitter is no better. You have bought a childs toy, the radio spectrum around 27 Mhz is full of low power devices such as yours, all squirting out poor quality RF signals, there is also the CB radio stuff. Your simple receiver is taking all this and just cant decode your transmitter because of it. OK, increase the transmitter power, add a power amplifier stage to the existing circuit. But, to be quite honest, the best way to improve that transmitter is to start again from scratch, it was designed to provide a signal at minimal cost, to control a cheap toy car. The advice you are getting here may not be what you were hoping for but it is the truth. JimB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Uncle $crooge |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
I wasn't suggesting you buy a new car, just some proper radio gear to fit in it, your existing gear is only a toy - which is why it doesn't have any decent range. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
That car is a kit sold from elenco
it is about $26:00 dollars or in that range. If you were to replace the electronics with the expensive rc, you would be at a total of around 75 to more for a rc car. I think he want's a cheap way to do it and also it still would not get a range of a 1000. Most likely only 300. So there is no way that he could get that range.
__________________
Robotics is heaven in my book. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
True, but with a wireless camera
depending on the price, you could get one that would be capable of getting even a more greater distance then 300 feet, but would jack up the price of the little toy rc kit.
__________________
Robotics is heaven in my book. |
|
|
|
|