Electronic Projects, forums and more.

Go Back   Electronic Circuits Projects Diagrams Free > Electronics Forums > Datasheet/Parts Requests


Datasheet/Parts Requests Request a datasheet or enquire about part equivalents and/or difficult-to-find parts here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27th May 2008, 02:36 PM   (permalink)
Angry 2SK1058 from Futurlec - beware!

Some of my students purchased the 2SK1058 (n-chan) / 2SJ162 (p-chan) complimentary MOSFETs from Futurlec for an audio amp project. I thought it was weird that the 2SK1058 was a little over a $1, and the compliment 2SJ162 to it was over $7, both from Futurlec. So after they came in, the amplifier did not work, set even to its lowest bias. I personally tested the removed MOSFETs, as well as other spares that were never used. Every single 1058 acted like it was always on, regardless of its Vgs. The 162s acted appropriately for a p-channel MOSFET.

The most basic test consisted of a short between gate and source, a 15 ohm 10W resistor from drain to +10V, and source grounded. The MOSFET acted as if it was on, with a Vds of ~0.7V! I couldn't turn the MOSFET off at all. I checked another five of these and they were all like that.

I guess it makes sense that they sell the n-channel version so cheaply, in fact, nobody in the industry comes close! They seem to be junk, so buyers beware!
__________________
"Everything that is done in the world is done by hope." -Martin Luther
"There are two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle."-Albert Einstein

Last edited by Analog; 27th May 2008 at 02:37 PM.
Analog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2008, 03:49 PM   (permalink)
Default

Hrm. I got some IRF1310's there for cheap. I thought it might have been too cheap. Hmm. I'll have to try them and see I guess.

Last edited by speakerguy79; 27th May 2008 at 03:50 PM.
speakerguy79 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2008, 06:51 PM   (permalink)
Default

Have you Emailed Futurlec with this? Doubt they test/check each and every component. It would do them and everyone else a service to let them know about these parts. If they got a large quantity, they would have a chance to correct the problem before it gets too big. They might also replace your parts, give a refund or credit. Might take some time and patience, they aren't the quickest or most talkative, but have only read a few post where they absolutely refused to do anything. I maybe order from 3-4 times a year, about 5 years now, never a quality issue, usually exceed my expectations. If they were crooked, pretty sure I'd have seen something suspicious over the years...

Students... Any chance they might have gotten their grubby hands in the parts bin? Haven't used a lot of fets, my instructor in High School scared the crap out of me with all the talk about how fragile they are, and how easy they are to damage, all the special care in handling and installing, ect... Not sure how real all that was, but have been finding that they aren't so bad (perhaps I'm over cautious).
HarveyH42 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2008, 08:32 PM   (permalink)
Default

FET's these days are pretty rugged. I've tossed them around a lot without any caution regarding ESD and I haven't ever had a FET fail that wasn't in response to me catching it on fire. I think this is one of those things they more or less fixed within the last decade.

Last edited by speakerguy79; 27th May 2008 at 08:33 PM.
speakerguy79 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2008, 08:43 PM   (permalink)
Default

Not unusual considering 2SK1058 is an ENHANCEMENT Mode MOSFET thus they have different threshold characteristics from your conventional, garden-variety MOSFET and may be slightly "on" even at 0V Vgs. A negative Vgs (positive for P-ch) will ensure they are completely off. Review the spec sheet.

2SK1058 has zener protection diodes built into its gate, it is difficult to damage them with static.
__________________
I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes.

Last edited by Oznog; 27th May 2008 at 08:44 PM.
Oznog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2008, 10:34 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oznog View Post
Not unusual considering 2SK1058 is an ENHANCEMENT Mode MOSFET thus they have different threshold characteristics from your conventional, garden-variety MOSFET and may be slightly "on" even at 0V Vgs. A negative Vgs (positive for P-ch) will ensure they are completely off. Review the spec sheet.

2SK1058 has zener protection diodes built into its gate, it is difficult to damage them with static.
Oznog,
Thanks for the reply, and I agree with you on the slightly "on" aspect. However, if you looked at what I did, you'd see that they are definitely not just slightly on, but very on. Below is the transfer characteristic of the N-channel 1058 from the data sheet. As you can see, it should have an Id of maybe a few milliamps at Vgs=0. The parts that I tested, including 5 virgin parts that came out of the anti-static packaging, were exhibiting an Id of ~950mA at Vgs=0.

The 2nd graph is one that I did for the P-channel 162. As you can see, it follows the appropriate curve for a P - channel, noting - of course, that the polarities are reversed for everything. It's Id<10mA at Vgs=0.

I'm just saying its suspicious that their part is sooo cheap - I can't find the 2SK1058 anywhere else under $7, whilst they are charging <$2.

If anything else looks funny on my analysis, please let me know. Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2sk1058.jpg (41.8 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg Image1.jpg (17.8 KB, 6 views)
__________________
"Everything that is done in the world is done by hope." -Martin Luther
"There are two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle."-Albert Einstein
Analog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2008, 10:57 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oznog View Post
Not unusual considering 2SK1058 is an ENHANCEMENT Mode MOSFET thus they have different threshold characteristics from your conventional, garden-variety MOSFET and may be slightly "on" even at 0V Vgs. A negative Vgs (positive for P-ch) will ensure they are completely off. Review the spec sheet.
I couldn't find a datasheet for an old 2SK1058 Mosfet. Maybe they are war surplus (which war?)

Nearly all garden variety Mosfets are ENHANCEMENT mode.

An old N-channel IRF540 Mosfet has a max leakage current of only 25uA at its max voltage when its Vgs is zero. Like thousands of other Mosfets its theshold voltage is a minimum of 2.0V when it conducts a max current of only 250uA.
__________________
Uncle $crooge
audioguru is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2008, 11:17 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by speakerguy79 View Post
FET's these days are pretty rugged. I've tossed them around a lot without any caution regarding ESD and I haven't ever had a FET fail that wasn't in response to me catching it on fire. I think this is one of those things they more or less fixed within the last decade.
Thanks. High School was 26 years ago. It's just something that really stuck with me. He was one of my favorite instructors, tolerated a lot of our 'fooling around', didn't treat us like kids, wasn't always serious or business-like. The things he did stress, weren't forgotten.
HarveyH42 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2008, 12:47 AM   (permalink)
Default

Ah true. Most are Enhancement mode, I was trying to point out that the 2SK1058 has the unusual feature of no significant threshold knee.
This is probably a silly question, but are you sure you had zero volts on Vgs (shorted), not just left floating, and didn't get the pins mixed up?

~950mA is certainly beyond the acceptable limits. The people to contact would be the part manufacturer. Future Electronics generally deals in parts from active manufacturers, not surplus or no-name, but I wouldn't talk to Future, you'd just get a sales person with no ability to investigate your problem. The mfg should have a representative who should investigate bad parts.

I could not find 2sk1058 on Future Electronics website at all.
__________________
I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes.

Last edited by Oznog; 28th May 2008 at 12:50 AM.
Oznog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2008, 01:42 AM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oznog View Post
Ah true. Most are Enhancement mode, I was trying to point out that the 2SK1058 has the unusual feature of no significant threshold knee.
This is probably a silly question, but are you sure you had zero volts on Vgs (shorted), not just left floating, and didn't get the pins mixed up?

~950mA is certainly beyond the acceptable limits. The people to contact would be the part manufacturer. Future Electronics generally deals in parts from active manufacturers, not surplus or no-name, but I wouldn't talk to Future, you'd just get a sales person with no ability to investigate your problem. The mfg should have a representative who should investigate bad parts.

I could not find 2sk1058 on Future Electronics website at all.
Oznog,

I believe you are confusing Future Electronics with the company Futurlec, which is completely different. Futurlec seems to carry some of the more hard to find and obsolete parts, and I use them because they are cheap, but I guess I got what I paid for! Anyhow, here is the link to Futurlec:

Futurlec, The Electronic Components and Semiconductor Superstore

2SK1058: Transistors - Mosfet - 2SK1058

2SJ162: Transistors - Mosfet - 2SJ162

Audioguru: Digikey also has data sheets for both devices. Thanks!
__________________
"Everything that is done in the world is done by hope." -Martin Luther
"There are two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle."-Albert Einstein
Analog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2008, 02:16 AM   (permalink)
Default

The datasheet does not have spec's for the max current when the Vgs is zero. Every other manufacturer does.

Two graphs show a typical current of zero when the Vgs is zero.
__________________
Uncle $crooge
audioguru is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2008, 02:17 AM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
2SK1058 has the unusual feature of no significant threshold knee.
I believe it is a lateral mosfet, not a vertical mosfet. Verticals are much better at switching, laterals are more linear and are used more often for audio amplifiers.
speakerguy79 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2008, 02:28 AM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Analog View Post
I believe you are confusing Future Electronics with the company Futurlec, which is completely different.
Ah, you believe right.
__________________
I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes.
Oznog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2008, 12:38 PM   (permalink)
Default

Thanks to all that replied. I am going to buy some of the 1058s from other sources, and I'll let you know how they pan out.
__________________
"Everything that is done in the world is done by hope." -Martin Luther
"There are two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle."-Albert Einstein
Analog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2008, 05:27 PM   (permalink)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by audioguru View Post
The datasheet does not have spec's for the max current when the Vgs is zero. Every other manufacturer does.

Two graphs show a typical current of zero when the Vgs is zero.
Naw, but it DOES specify a "Vgs Cutoff Voltage" of 0.15V-0.45V, conditions Ids=100mA Vds=10V. So below that Vgs, current must be below 100mA. Which it is definitely not.
__________________
I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes.
Oznog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Latest
Beware of Chinese Capacitors! (or products using them) Styx Chit-Chat 31 25th December 2007 07:44 AM
Source for Power Mosfet 2SK1058/2SJ162 or substitute????? Analog Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews 3 21st July 2006 10:04 PM
My RC Car (Homemade tank) 56k'ers beware pike General Electronics Chat 22 1st June 2005 12:12 PM
help identify these **56K beware** earz_cd General Electronics Chat 9 14th January 2005 09:39 AM
www.futurlec.com reliability SupeR-NovA General Electronics Chat 0 21st March 2004 11:47 AM



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:01 AM.


Electronic Circuits  |  Electronics Wiki
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.