![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Chit-Chat Relax for a bit and have a general conversation (off topic is allowed!) with other members. Please be polite and respect your fellow members. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
(permalink) |
|
The key sequence should work. If not then you can use character map under accessories/system tools.
No, I didn't mean 180°, I meant throw it sideways. By throwing it sideways you effectively give it an orbit that is a fraction of a degree different from yours and so your paths will cross twice per orbit. Alternatively, think what would happen if you threw it vertically away from the earth, this causes the object to follow an elliptical orbit that will cross yours twice per revolution. Mike. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Copy and paste work, but the other instructions in the helpfile (with numlock on, type alt+0080) didn't seem to have any effect (other than a beep when the 0 is pressed).
What ever happened to the guys from 98°? I posit that it's impossible to throw anything at exactly 90° in space. I'm still not following Mike about what he means by throwing an object sideways. A few degrees off, or towards or against the direction of motion, or many degrees off, you ain't ever gonna see that object again. Hell, I can barely find half the stuff I throw into my garage. Thinking more about throwing an object: it's impossible for a thrown object to have an orbit that exactly intersects the object from which it was thrown. Last edited by Hank Fletcher; 23rd March 2008 at 04:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Any two orbits that share a point in space must share the point that is on the opposite side of the earth due to the fact that they are both doing giant circles about the center of the earth. Think of two infinitely thin hula hoop, one inside the other.
This is much easier to visualise when something is thrown upward. As it gains height it looses speed until it starts to fall back to earth. As it looses height it gains speed and so the object oscillates about the original orbit. An example of this is Pluto which orbits both inside and outside Neptune's orbit. Mike. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
[quote=killivolt]
Quote:
i mean, I wouldnt let an astronaut fat enough to have his own gravitational force onto a shuttle w/ me. space travel is difficult enough without having to have a separate physisist crunching numbers to accomodate for one side of the shuttle being a half ton heavier than the other. lol |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) |
|
Your mum's so fat she pulls all the men by gravitational attraction.
__________________
I also post at the following sites: http://www.stop-microsoft.org http://www.heated-debates.com Screen name: Aloone_Jonez |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
Torben |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
If you throw an object from an orbiting station, you are imparting a velocity on it which is different from the station from which it was thrown. Would its orbit not then become eccentric (assuming that the station had a circular orbit)? Torben |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
Mike. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
(permalink) | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Latest |
| Substituting a 16x2 LCD display for 16x1 LCD display? | Dawny | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 19 | Yesterday 08:58 AM |
| blank space within atoms | mehdiinlove | Chit-Chat | 39 | 11th March 2007 07:03 AM |
| Parking Space Detection | dmiga | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 4 | 16th June 2004 12:05 AM |
| Protect a memory space for pic877? | EYF | Micro Controllers | 1 | 12th November 2003 10:07 AM |
| world space radio receiver project | ks_raman | Electronic Projects Design/Ideas/Reviews | 1 | 27th August 2003 11:16 AM |