processor - Page 3 - Electronic Circuits Projects Diagrams Free

audioguru · 28th July 2006, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ParkingLotLust

Intels arent supposed to go over 65 degrees celsuis, I dont know what that is in farenheit, but AMDs are supposed to run cooler than that.

My Pentium4 2.93GHz operates at 52 degrees C. It has an automatic variable speed fan that keeps that temp. I hear the fan speed up when the processor is thinking very hard.

ParkingLotLust · 28th July 2006, 05:05 PM

My P4 2.8 overclocked to 3.2 runs at 50 under a full load, watercooled. 42 idle.

Overclocked · 28th July 2006, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marks256

Yes, 4 cores will be nice, but AMD is gonna kick ass if they can pull of a 8 core processer! I have a bad fealing the cases will need really advanced cooling systems. What is a safe tempurature for operation on a CPU. I have my AMD Sempron 2800+(32bit

), it reaches temps of about 100-103. Is that safe? Or am i tempting fate? It isn't overclocked, but i did once, temps went really high. I am also using a stock heatsink and fan.

Usually People use C for their temps. 100F to C=37, 103F = 39C. Yea, I say your temps are really good! There are new coolers out that are better than watercooling! Ie, Noctua NH-u12 and its brother, NH-U9 (which is smaller). Both are very quiet, and even beat a Zalman.

Marks256 · 28th July 2006, 08:41 PM

Sorry, i am still trying to grasp metric measurements. So my temps are very good? So it would safe to overclock it? Hmmm.....

srimannarayanakarthik · 28th July 2006, 08:42 PM

amd is really good for gaming and 3d graphic designs,but the problem in it is there is no proper cooling system and thefan given may not be enough,if u r going for it,ill suggest u to buy an another fan and fit it

Overclocked · 29th July 2006, 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marks256

Yes, 4 cores will be nice, but AMD is gonna kick ass if they can pull of a 8 core processer! I have a bad fealing the cases will need really advanced cooling systems. What is a safe tempurature for operation on a CPU. I have my AMD Sempron 2800+(32bit

), it reaches temps of about 100-103. Is that safe? Or am i tempting fate? It isn't overclocked, but i did once, temps went really high. I am also using a stock heatsink and fan.

I dont know what happened to my last post, but Yes that is safe. Your CPU ranges from 37 to 39C. Thats normal for a Really good cooler. There are better heatsinks that get near and better than water cooling temps, such as the Noctua Nh-U12 and ThermalTake Big Typhoon.Those temps usualy range from the lower up 20's to the lower 30's

lord loh. · 29th July 2006, 04:50 AM

http://hardwaresecrets.com/

Overclocked · 29th July 2006, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marks256

Sorry, i am still trying to grasp metric measurements. So my temps are very good? So it would safe to overclock it? Hmmm.....

Wow I must have not seen my reply...

Umm, Id say Yes. But Stop If you start getting Near 50C. They can withstand temps up to around 60C, But I wouldnt risk it. Once my proc gets to 66C, It freezes and I have to restart.

Marks256 · 29th July 2006, 10:28 PM

Yes, i will look at a non-stock cooler. Thanks!

Overclocked · 30th July 2006, 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marks256

Yes, i will look at a non-stock cooler. Thanks!

I suggest (1) Noctua NH-U12 or NH-U9 (if you can find it), Thermal Take Big Typhoon, Or Zalman (I forgot which one though..). They all go around 40 Bucks.

philba · 30th July 2006, 03:56 AM

sarcasim is unwarrented. windows grows faster than moores law. it is an immutable law of nature that software expands to consume all storage and cpu cycles available.

Exo · 31st July 2006, 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marks256

No, intel is just too cheap. I am fairly sure that Intel will become obsolete in the near future, unless they shape up. Intel just can't seem to understand that there are ways to make CPUs cheaper, yet faster. Heck, just like IBM did with that other company; added germanium to the silicon! I would pay $500+ for a CPU that runs at 100ghz, let-alone 1thz!
I think the real problem lies with the motherboards. Screw old technology, bring on the faster mobos!

100 Ghz is impossible.
Electricity moves at the speed of light , calculate for yourself how far it would be able to get at 100Ghz , assuming a perfect (non existing) enviroment.

Even for prescott's intel had the toughest time designing the cache lines to operate at only 3/4 ghz

Marks256 · 31st July 2006, 02:11 AM

No, it is not. Here is the link;
http://news.com.com/Chip+breaks+spee...l?tag=nefd.top

It was possable by bringing the CPU just above absolute zero. The CPU probably isn't a fully functional CPU, but it is a start. It was made using germainium mixed with the silicon.

poopeater · 8th August 2006, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marks256

No, intel is just too cheap. I am fairly sure that Intel will become obsolete in the near future, unless they shape up. Intel just can't seem to understand that there are ways to make CPUs cheaper, yet faster. Heck, just like IBM did with that other company; added germanium to the silicon! I would pay $500+ for a CPU that runs at 100ghz, let-alone 1thz!
I think the real problem lies with the motherboards. Screw old technology, bring on the faster mobos!

ROFL yeah, I'm sure that Intel should listen to a 15-yo kid. You have EVERYTHING all figured out.

As of right now, Intel has the fastest platform out, PERIOD. The core 2 duo chips kill anything AMD has to offer in every single benchmark out there. If you want the best of the best, there is no question that you should get a core 2 duo platform.

Marks256 · 8th August 2006, 10:06 PM

Quote:

ROFL yeah, I'm sure that Intel should listen to a 15-yo kid. You have EVERYTHING all figured out.

And what is it that they should listen to? I never said they should do anything.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

28th July 2006, 05:05 PM	(permalink)
ParkingLotLust	My P4 2.8 overclocked to 3.2 runs at 50 under a full load, watercooled. 42 idle.

28th July 2006, 08:41 PM	(permalink)
Marks256	Sorry, i am still trying to grasp metric measurements. So my temps are very good? So it would safe to overclock it? Hmmm.....

28th July 2006, 08:42 PM	(permalink)
srimannarayanakarthik	amd is really good for gaming and 3d graphic designs,but the problem in it is there is no proper cooling system and thefan given may not be enough,if u r going for it,ill suggest u to buy an another fan and fit it

29th July 2006, 04:50 AM	(permalink)
lord loh.	http://hardwaresecrets.com/ __________________ Bharath Bhushan Lohray. M.Sc. Electronics.

29th July 2006, 10:28 PM	(permalink)
Marks256	Yes, i will look at a non-stock cooler. Thanks!

30th July 2006, 03:56 AM	(permalink)
philba	sarcasim is unwarrented. windows grows faster than moores law. it is an immutable law of nature that software expands to consume all storage and cpu cycles available.

31st July 2006, 02:11 AM	(permalink)
Marks256	No, it is not. Here is the link; http://news.com.com/Chip+breaks+spee...l?tag=nefd.top It was possable by bringing the CPU just above absolute zero. The CPU probably isn't a fully functional CPU, but it is a start. It was made using germainium mixed with the silicon.