Oznog

Well, I'm not against experimentation- but cancer is such a sensitive subject that presenting these unjustified promises exploits the situation in a totally unethical and immoral manner. It is unlikely his research will be any more effective than the traditional magic rocks, beans, and powders but he's already presenting it knowing people will actually believe in it and support him. If people were believing in his questionable plan for making money buying homes with no-money-down that's one thing, but promising he can save people's loved ones is a far more sensitive subject.

__________________
I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes.

yngndrw

Well from the way I read the article, I don't think that he's giving any unjust promises - I believe it's the journalist who wrote this who is just writing it in the way that they do.

Who knows if the current Cancer Research will find a solution, it most probably won't - But we have to go through many years of finding nothing in order to eventually find the solution. That's just the way luck works.

That's the way I see it anyway.