![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| | |||||||
| Alternative Energy Discussion relating to the design and implementation of alternate energies. |
| | LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | (permalink) |
| lol, long live the Zeta Reticulians.
__________________ Pay it forward. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| There is a machine called a P.E.T. scan machine. It uses very small amounts of antimater (yes i said antimatter) that it introduces into the brain or body somewhere and after it reacts with the tissue it gives off gama radiation that a computer then annalizes and then gives you an image. Just give it some time and one day we may be able to meet those zeta reticulans. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Squigy, you know the saying “Don’t believe everything you see on TV”? Now keep in mind that YouTube doesn’t have all the checks and balances that TV does.… | |
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
Positron emission tomography - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia positron-emitting radionuclide ≠ antimatter Ken
__________________ "To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk." Thomas A. Edison (1847 - 1931) Last edited by KMoffett; 19th October 2008 at 01:46 PM. | ||
| |
| | (permalink) |
| I am not versed in this positron subject, but here is what Wiki says about a positron: The positron or antielectron is the antiparticle or the antimatter counterpart of the electron. It is common in biology to inject Isotopes into an organism and use it as a tracer to follow a process, so a PET scan sounds similar to this. I doubt this Positron thing is like converting a rock into a steak (replicator) like you see on Startrek.
__________________ Pay it forward. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| I think Ken means the radionuclide used in the machine is not antimatter, which is correct. However, the emitted positrons certainly are.
__________________ Go Trojans! | |
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
Torben
__________________ Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat. | ||
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
__________________ Pay it forward. | ||
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
So while the electron and positron are destroyed, it turns out that the ash from a positron-electron fire is gamma photons. Kinda like water is the ash from a hydrogen-water fire. Which is why water makes a lousy fuel: it's ash. Torben
__________________ Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat. | ||
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Very cool... That makes sense...
__________________ Pay it forward. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| With annihilation two 511 keV gammas take off in opposite directions.
__________________ Go Trojans! | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| For that matter, people do demos of this in classroom, etc. They use a strong electromagnet, positrons from Na-22 and electrons from Kr-85. When combined in the magnet, the antimatter annihilation causes both particles to cease to exist and in their place the aforementioned pair of 511 keV gammas.
__________________ Go Trojans! | |
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
__________________ Pay it forward. | ||
| |
| | (permalink) |
| NA-22 naturaly gives off positrons? News to me. So why cant we just use that as a source of antimatter? electrons are everywhere and impossible to completely remove? There must be a catch, there always is or i probably just didnt understand something. so the electromagnet contains everything and the krypton supplies electrons or what. Is there some sort of a name for this demonstration? How can i learn more? | |
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
In the demo the Krypton supplies the electrons, as I mentioned, and the magnet contains the reaction, yes. In nature positrons emitted by any radionuclide annihilate with surrounding electrons without our implicit observation and generate gammas all the time.
__________________ Go Trojans! Last edited by saturn1bguy; 21st October 2008 at 04:31 AM. | ||
| |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.electro-tech-online.com/alternative-energy/30949-hydroxy-gas.html | ||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| TheSamba.com :: View topic - Anyone try some Hydrogen on Demand Fuel saving devices | This thread | Refback | 20th May 2008 05:50 PM | |