Electronic Projects, forums and more.

Go Back   Electronic Circuits Projects Diagrams Free > Electronics Categories > Alternative Energy


Alternative Energy Discussion relating to the design and implementation of alternate energies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14th January 2007, 02:18 AM   (permalink)
Experienced Member
 
Oznog is just really niceOznog is just really niceOznog is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Oznog
Default Hey like my math on the "Beck Mickle hydro generator"?

I heard from a guy telling how great this new amateur-invented backyard hydroelectric generator is supposed to be. 2KW from 8" of head.

I had to do the math on this one, since it's all easily calculable. The numbers get pretty... implausible.
I went ahead and posted it under the PESWiki entry for posterity, titled "Performance Calculations":
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directo...ydro_Generator

I hope I didn't make any math errors. I did try to double check it.
__________________
I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes.
Oznog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2007, 05:15 AM   (permalink)
Experienced Member
Pommie is a splendid one to beholdPommie is a splendid one to beholdPommie is a splendid one to beholdPommie is a splendid one to beholdPommie is a splendid one to beholdPommie is a splendid one to beholdPommie is a splendid one to behold
Default

I can't do Lbs Feet etc.

In metric it comes out slightly different

Joules = Mass * Height * Gravity

2000 = M * 8*0.0254 * 9.81

M = 1003Kg = 1003 Liters = 265 Gallons

Close enough.

Mike.
Pommie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2007, 06:46 AM   (permalink)
Experienced Member
 
dknguyen is a splendid one to beholddknguyen is a splendid one to beholddknguyen is a splendid one to beholddknguyen is a splendid one to beholddknguyen is a splendid one to beholddknguyen is a splendid one to beholddknguyen is a splendid one to beholddknguyen is a splendid one to behold
Default

I think a slug is the most ridiculous unit to ever walk the Earth.
dknguyen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2007, 05:19 PM   (permalink)
Experienced Member
 
Oznog is just really niceOznog is just really niceOznog is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Oznog
Default

The metric system is the tool of the devil!
My car gets forty rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I likes it!
__________________
I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes.
Oznog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2007, 08:05 AM   (permalink)
Experienced Member
ljcox is a jewel in the roughljcox is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oznog
The metric system is the tool of the devil!
My car gets forty rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I likes it!
I gave imperial away as a bad joke 40 years ago.

12 inches in a foot, 3 feet in a yard, 22 yards in a chain, can't remember (and don't wish to) how many chains in a furlong, etc.

12 oz in a lb, 112 lb in a hundred weight, etc.

16 fluid oz ina pint, 2 pints in a quart, 4 quarts in a gallon.

What a ridiculous system!!
__________________
Len
ljcox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2007, 08:20 AM   (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Nigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ljcox
I gave imperial away as a bad joke 40 years ago.
Obviously true!.

Quote:

12 oz in a lb
There's 14 oz in a lb!
__________________
PIC programmer software, and PIC Tutorials at:
http://www.winpicprog.co.uk
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2007, 08:34 AM   (permalink)
Experienced Member
ljcox is a jewel in the roughljcox is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel Goodwin
There's 14 oz in a lb!
Oh, is there? That shows how long it is since I used the stupid system.
__________________
Len
ljcox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2007, 08:37 AM   (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Nigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to behold
Default

You also forgot to mention:

12 pennies in a shilling
20 shillings in a pound
21 shillings in a guinea
__________________
PIC programmer software, and PIC Tutorials at:
http://www.winpicprog.co.uk
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2007, 11:03 AM   (permalink)
Experienced Member
Pommie is a splendid one to beholdPommie is a splendid one to beholdPommie is a splendid one to beholdPommie is a splendid one to beholdPommie is a splendid one to beholdPommie is a splendid one to beholdPommie is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel Goodwin
Obviously true!.



There's 14 oz in a lb!
Are you telling me that a quarter pounder only weighs 3½oz. No wonder I've been losing weight

Mike.
Pommie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2007, 11:33 AM   (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Nigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pommie
Are you telling me that a quarter pounder only weighs 3½oz. No wonder I've been losing weight
Actually, I was wrong as well!.

There's 16 oz in a lb
and 14 lb in a stone
(probably!)
__________________
PIC programmer software, and PIC Tutorials at:
http://www.winpicprog.co.uk
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2007, 08:07 PM   (permalink)
Experienced Member
ljcox is a jewel in the roughljcox is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel Goodwin
Actually, I was wrong as well!.

There's 16 oz in a lb
and 14 lb in a stone
(probably!)
Yes, you're right. I'd fotgotten about stones.

Also the British ton is 2240 lb but the Amercian ton is 2000 lb!!!
__________________
Len
ljcox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2007, 08:26 PM   (permalink)
Experienced Member
 
Oznog is just really niceOznog is just really niceOznog is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Oznog
Default

An ounce of feathers is lighter than an ounce of gold.
However, a pound of feathers is heavier than a pound of gold.

The first statement is odd enough- the second being contradictory is just absurd.
Yet both are completely true.
__________________
I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes.
Oznog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2007, 09:55 PM   (permalink)
Experienced Member
ljcox is a jewel in the roughljcox is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oznog
An ounce of feathers is lighter than an ounce of gold.
However, a pound of feathers is heavier than a pound of gold.

The first statement is odd enough- the second being contradictory is just absurd.
Yet both are completely true.
Of course they are not true.

The weight is the same in both cases.

However, it may be more difficult to lift a pound of feathers as they will fill a larger volume thus making them feel heavier.
__________________
Len
ljcox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2007, 10:08 PM   (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Nigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to beholdNigel Goodwin is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ljcox
Of course they are not true.

The weight is the same in both cases.
I feel you're missing the point! - gold is weighed in 'troy ounces', not normal ounces - and they are different. Don't know if 'troy pounds' exist or not, it's not something you really measure gold in!

BTW, the use of 'feathers' was a trap you fell into, he could just as easily said 'lead'.
__________________
PIC programmer software, and PIC Tutorials at:
http://www.winpicprog.co.uk
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2007, 12:58 AM   (permalink)
Experienced Member
ljcox is a jewel in the roughljcox is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel Goodwin
I feel you're missing the point! - gold is weighed in 'troy ounces', not normal ounces - and they are different. Don't know if 'troy pounds' exist or not, it's not something you really measure gold in! .
Yes, I had forgotten about troy weight. But I feel it proves the point I was making about it being a ridiculous system.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel Goodwin
BTW, the use of 'feathers' was a trap you fell into, he could just as easily said 'lead'.
No, if you re-read what I wrote, I said it may be more difficult to lift due to the volume (not the weight), ie. it would be a larger container that would be more awkward to lift.
__________________
Len
ljcox is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:36 AM.


Electronic Circuits  |  Radio Controlled
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.