![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| | |||||||
| Alternative Energy Discussion relating to the design and implementation of alternate energies. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | (permalink) |
| We'd all love to see something wonderful happen, but great than 100% efficiency is never going to!. I'm sure we'd all love to see Sreorn actually produce something viable, but he's never shown the slightest hint he's ever going to. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, swims like a duck, flys like a duck - then it's almost certainly a duck!. Substitute 'scam' for 'duck' and you have Steorn!. | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| I always thought the vavle would come back and be the device to produce overunity. See, I have faith | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Hmm maybe I didn't make myself clear, sorry. I'm not going to say either way, as its pretty pointless even discussing it, at least with regard to 'steorn'. Good to see people repeating themselves though, and yes many 'claim' to break the law of thermodynamics, but as I've said (I'm repeating myself now) that requires a closed system. Am I the only one who see's the 'tennis match' of 'its all crap' and 'you're just denying it!' arguments as utterly pointless? If you believe it is truely a 'new device' then less talk, more experiements, and thus proof. If you don't believe it at all, then why on earth are you discussing it? Surely by giving a small amount of your own time to post is giving some credence to it, thats why most credible scientists just blank such subjects. As for 'faith', it gets a bit philosophical there Sorry, probably should abandon this topic myself. Blueteeth
__________________ Inconsistency is the key to flexibility! | |
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Here's the solution to our little problem. If you believe and are willing to defend it, put your money where your mouth is. Simple as that. For me, there is no downside to disbelief. | |
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
| ||
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
I have 'dabbled' in such experiments, just to satisfy my own curiousity and yes, many scams, false truths or just poor reasoning account for many idea's. And that goes for both sides of the argument. Instant acceptance or denial is just the easy way out. Again, I'm sorry, I appear to have added to the general pseudo-science argument thing. Blueteeth
__________________ Inconsistency is the key to flexibility! | ||
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
Care to elaborate on that ? I might bother to go elsewhere After all you are just a person who runs a computer program Many others can and do run the same software.
__________________ I Hate Microsoft-the site below says it well http://www.vanwensveen.nl/rants/micr...eMS_intro.html Last edited by tytower; 27th December 2006 at 09:51 PM. | ||
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
I voted for this section and enjoy it. And as if we did not know there would be some of this Anyway, being here as long as you have and comments like the above to one that's highly respected here. It is clear you have not read outside of Alternate Engery. You might be right, this might not be the kind of place you are looking for. EDIT: Just my two cents, not trying to be mean.. Last edited by mramos1; 27th December 2006 at 11:09 PM. | ||
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Where is it written that super moderators should not have opinions, or at least should not express them? Is there any harm done by Nigel expressing his opinion? | |
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
| ||
| |
| | (permalink) |
| I think the point of all this, is that this forum could be about established and usable alternative energy, rather than arguing about something in the news has merit or a scam. These types of threads would be more apropriate in the 'Chit-Chat' forum, as its of no practical value to anyone exploring alternatives for their energy needs. But since this is purely opinion... I don't believe this based on anything science, as it defies everything I was ever taught in school about scientific methods. Doesn't even qualify as theory. A very weak hypothies at best. I'm guessing that if they do have something, it has some huge limitation or flaw, that would render it useless to any practical application. Knowing this, and seeking investor's money would be criminal and a scam. Only time will tell. Guessing sometime next year the truth will come out. | |
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
Article 2.3.1a, Section 4.8.2, Paragraph 972.3 it says and I quote.. Opps. Never mind, that is how to set the record mode if using cable TV. Still looking for it Ron. EDIT: dknguyen: I only saw [I AGREE] (I see that a lot). Sure there was something about that? Last edited by mramos1; 28th December 2006 at 01:46 AM. | ||
| |
| | (permalink) | ||
| Quote:
If you know Joe Cell is a Joke Cell, do not read that one. If you like all the cool stuff Brian has done, read that one.. I like both. Heck, love to so see his place.. That rox.. The fake videos are like name that component. Quote:
You make a good point. We can leave "REAL" alternate energy here, like Wind, Solar, Hydro, etc, etc.. Take the fake videos, fake claims to chit-chat as well as "the name the component" there too.. That way when UFO people come here, they will laugh at how we mortals only know the simple stuff and leave.. | |||
| |
| | (permalink) | |
| Quote:
Yeah, I've agreed to so many things I haven't read, it's a wonder someone hasn't repossessed my house. | ||
| |
| | (permalink) |
| Next you'll be telling me Santa Claus doesn't exist. | |
| |